Originally posted by quackadikt
View Post
If growing elk densities cause a loss in stocking rates on Private land then compensating them with a tag that generates money for the state and covers private loses is the right thing to do, especially if it maintains elk populations.
Those ranchers are not open to public without the UW program. Forget just hunting the private, look at how many acres of access some of those properties block. It's not just the gila but every primary elk unit in the state.
I agree with you on the cow tags, then again that's the same legislative decision process that's trying to also phase out ALL vouchers. Same voters that would also vote no to all NR’s tag if they could.
Comment