Big Buck hot spot

[King_G]

Who agrees with this map

[Mexico]

Why the heck would Maverick not be highlighted? Year after year it's a BnC producer.

[175gr7.62]

It sums it up pretty good. You could shift most of the areas out or in and still be good.

[drop dead fred]

It sums it up pretty good. You could shift most of the areas out or in and still be good.

X2

[popeandyoung151]

I’d agree. But I would say that their are areas in almost any given county that are consistent producers of huge WT.

[GoneSouth]

I hear of some bruisers that come outa Denton County

[RMW]

Map is crap!

Austin, Washington, Colorado = little racks

[Grayson]

No, it's outdated. Maverick, Denton, and Collin need to be included, at minimum.

Also, "big buck" is a relative term, but in my opinion some of the included hill country counties need to be removed.

[BolilloLoco]

When was this published?

[rjtkdplus]

Horrible map! Kansas and Iowa are not even on it!

[CentexRancher]

I have no clue about other counties, but I know for sure Fayette, Austin, and Washington are NOT big buck hot spots. A good buck in that area is 130s. Majority of bucks are young and do not meet AR. Colorado county is pretty good on the south side of I10, not a lot of monsters on the north side.

[flywise]

Looks pretty good from the experience I have

[KactusKiller]

Im not sure I have ever heard of gillespie, kerr, concho, menard or those other hill country counties being called Big Buck hot spots, There are big deer killed there but those counties are more about quantity than quantity. That shaded area needs to be moved west a county or two.

The eastern shaded area with navarro, freestone etc is pretty subject also.

[BrandonA]

I wouldn't consider Llano a big buck county

[Hoss163]

Any where in 8 you could kill a big buck