Don’t keep any target ammo either but I also re supplied after last BS only keep the good stuff and keep plenty on hand
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Personal Ammo Supply
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by softpoint View PostThis^^ And high volume isn't even always needed. Plenty of departed souls in WWII took a single .30/06 or 8mm Mauser through the upper torso. And neither the 9mm or the .45acp were designed with the intent to further aggravate an attacker.
With as many bullets that are available to people I could think of other reasons why they're not even the best choice for target practice aside from being a little cheaper. They ricochet like crazy and they're less accurate in some cases. They're really not a safe or good choice for anything other than shooting at a terrorist.Last edited by okrattler; 04-05-2020, 05:47 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by okrattler View PostThat's true. I was more or less talking about up close and personal type scenarios. During a fire fight they were probably shot over 100 yards away in most cases. An immediate threat I would much rather shoot with something that is more likely to kill or incapacitate as quickly as possible. Ball rounds definitely aren't harmless but for quickly putting an animal or dangerous person down there are better options. Like......a softpoint.....
I agree that I would rather have hollow points, but I wouldn’t say FMJs are ineffective.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iehooligan11b View PostThere are a lot of dead terrorists that would have to disagree with you sir.
I agree that I would rather have hollow points, but I wouldn’t say FMJs are ineffective.
Comment
-
I have plenty of ammo except for my 6.5 Grendel. Picked up another 100 rounds of it recently so feeling a little better about my ammo stock now. Wouldn't mind another 100 rounds for it but that was all they had at the time. I also picked up 2 more high capacity magazines for it.
Wouldn't mind grabbing another 1000 rounds or so of 22LR or another 100 for the Grendel.
Comment
-
Originally posted by okrattler View PostThat's true. I was more or less talking about up close and personal type scenarios. During a fire fight they were probably shot over 100 yards away in most cases. An immediate threat I would much rather shoot with something that is more likely to kill or incapacitate as quickly as possible. Ball rounds definitely aren't harmless but for quickly putting an animal or dangerous person down there are better options. Like......a softpoint.....
With as many bullets that are available to people I could think of other reasons why they're not even the best choice for target practice aside from being a little cheaper. They ricochet like crazy and they're less accurate in some cases. They're really not a safe or good choice for anything other than shooting at a terrorist.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iehooligan11b View PostHa right... I really don’t wanna get hit with a rock out of a sling shot to be honest
My first thought was I hope I can maybe take out 6-8 with those first 32 shots
Comment
Comment