ACB used the term sexual preference. Sen Hirono said that was an offensive term. Webster went in and changed their definition to fit Hirono's description. 1984 Thought Police in full effect.
-
ACB used the term sexual preference. Sen Hirono said that was an offensive term. Webster went in and changed their definition to fit Hirono's description. 1984 Thought Police in full effect. -
Don't you love how the left alone seems to be the sole collective that gets to determine (at will) what is "offensive", what the "Founders intended", who's a "Nazi/raaaaaaacist?" -
It tells you what party these companies keep in their pockets.Originally posted by JFISHER View PostComment
-
Some day all these people will die and spend eternity with pain and regret .
You can’t try to destroy a person for no reason and not pay a consequence at some pointComment
-
And I agree with them...
It’s not a “sexual preference”....it’s a “mental health disease”Comment
-
I think a lot of this caving to the left, just shows who they're scared of.Comment
-
Tucker Carlson showed numerous clips of Biden saying and using “sexual preference”.
Ok for him but no one else.Comment
-
Tucker destroys the Left's message nightly. And he does it with facts. He has a pretty clear view of "the big picture" in my estimation.Comment
-
The alphabet community sure gets offended easyComment
-
1984 is required reading for my kids. Some other books too, but 1984 is the one if you’re only going to read oneOriginally posted by LWC View PostComment
-
Stupid people can’t realize that if it’s not a preference then it would never change. The simple and celebrated fact that at any time one can be sexually attracted to something different than what one has been attracted to signifies that it is clearly a preference and/or choice. These people are so stupidComment
Comment