Originally posted by texasdeerhunter
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Get your Duramax while you can
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by softpoint View PostThis. And simply WANTING to quit internal engines by a certain date doesn't make it happen...In 2034, look for the date to be pushed back an additional 10-15 years. There will always be the democrat pols who want to go all electric, and just can't see what the holdup is, since their toy cars run great off batteries...
Comment
-
Guys real question. I looked into this in depth years ago. The burden on the earth producing the electricity seemed to offset the benefit recognized by electric cars. Not to mention the mining, etc that is required to make the batteries, etc. Has something happened that I am not aware of that makes this more viable? I don't pretend to be any sort of expert but all of this seemed a bit suspect to me back then.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rubberdown View PostGuys real question. I looked into this in depth years ago. The burden on the earth producing the electricity seemed to offset the benefit recognized by electric cars. Not to mention the mining, etc that is required to make the batteries, etc. Has something happened that I am not aware of that makes this more viable? I don't pretend to be any sort of expert but all of this seemed a bit suspect to me back then.
There has been numerous studies out over the years showing it's far less damaging to the environment to keep driving your current vehicle, instead of buying new. Which I guess is obvious.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rubberdown View PostGuys real question. I looked into this in depth years ago. The burden on the earth producing the electricity seemed to offset the benefit recognized by electric cars. Not to mention the mining, etc that is required to make the batteries, etc. Has something happened that I am not aware of that makes this more viable? I don't pretend to be any sort of expert but all of this seemed a bit suspect to me back then.
Read about the mining of REE's (Rare Earth Elements) and you wont feel so good about green energy. Scary part is much of the leaching process is done on the surface and generates very toxic byproducts that can easily enter ground/surface water stocks we depend on for life.
Comment
-
Originally posted by doright View PostIf I could recharge as fast as I can fill up then I would not mind having an electric truck ,but I don't want to sit on the side of the road for hours waiting on a battery to charge.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Walker View PostThe greenness haven't let us built nuclear plants in years and now we can't build coal or ng plants. Like I said before, not enough fans.
They’re building Plant Vogtle right now and just got Watts Bar 2 up. Democrats are backing off of the nuclear power hatred these days.
They realize that base load is necessary and nuke is the greenest base load there is.
Comment
-
Granted, as far as corporate disclosures go, BP is the crazy uncle of the family, but one telling sign of the extent to which the game is on was BP’s withdrawal from the American Petroleum Institute. BP disagreed with API’s position on electric vehicles, so they withdrew support. I believe Total is also pulling out of API, but I need to double check that.
BP has also either let go or re-assigned 600 of its 700 headcount in the O&G exploration department. ...an oil company not interested in finding oil.
Comment
-
I don’t see it happening. We will never get away from fossil fuels IMO. Green energy’s are regional and are not dependent in regards to their supply levels and availability. Lithium battery technology is expensive and unless they find a way to have adequate storage of power at a reasonable price it’s going to continue to be an option rather than the norm.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by canny View PostI don’t see it happening. We will never get away from fossil fuels IMO. Green energy’s are regional and are not dependent in regards to their supply levels and availability. Lithium battery technology is expensive and unless they find a way to have adequate storage of power at a reasonable price it’s going to continue to be an option rather than the norm.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can forget about the "reasonable price" factor. If Elon is admitting a big stumbling block then who do GM or (my beloved) Ford think they are? They are just doing their duty to appease shareholders and appealing to the green crowd. Waaaay to many hurdles to be spouting off a time table like that.
For people to think that our fossil fuel vehicles are the (alleged) problem, well thats just plain naive (or ignorant).
Comment
-
Originally posted by bakin7005 View Posthttps://www.mining.com/tesla-hit-by-...nickel-prices/
You can forget about the "reasonable price" factor. If Elon is admitting a big stumbling block then who do GM or (my beloved) Ford think they are? They are just doing their duty to appease shareholders and appealing to the green crowd. Waaaay to many hurdles to be spouting off a time table like that.
For people to think that our fossil fuel vehicles are the (alleged) problem, well thats just plain naive (or ignorant).
They can’t even prove there is any such thing as rising temps much less blame it on humanity. It’s all horse hock.
Comment
Comment