Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Alec Baldwin involved with shooting.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by bullets13 View PostI get that you don't like the guy. I don't like him either. but considering the likely circumstances, there are very few scenarios where this would be the appropriate charge.Originally posted by M16 View PostThat’s why our side always loses. I’m ready to go for the jugular and start winning again.Originally posted by bullets13 View Posthuh?
So I'm with M16 - Enough acting like the left plays a fair game..or that we should also.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PapaSmurf View Post
Unless they're trying to act like a prop gun is just a real gun that's disabled? But why not use a fake gun at that point?
Comment
-
Originally posted by bboswell View PostI get your point but it would be impossible to produce the movie shooting scenes realistically following that rule.
This is why prop gun are supposed to be disabled.
Maybe he should start putting his money where his mouth is and starting making (starring in) movies that don’t revolve around guns and killing people with guns?
Like that’s gonna happen. Lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by RiverRat1 View PostI don't understand how a "prop gun" can even fire a real bullet. Looks like the media is trying hard to sway people. He either pointed a real gun with a real bullet and shot or he didn't.
Unless they're trying to act like a prop gun is just a real gun that's disabled? But why not use a fake gun at that point?
I was reading about it because of this incident. Many guns that you see in movies are real guns. It said if they want something to look authentic, nothing could be more authentic than the real thing. The way the actor carries the gun because of its weight and the muzzle flash and recoil when needed.
Comment
Comment