I’m in the market for a new scope and looking at the NXS 5.5-22 and NX8 2.5-20 2fp line. I’m reading some reviews saying the NX8 has some issues with “tunnel vision “ at high magnification as well as poor eye box / eye relief. For those with experience with both...If I’m not worried about weight or length would I be better off going with the NXS line for those reasons?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NX8 2.5-20 2fp vs NXS 5.5-22 please provide your opinion
Collapse
X
-
Personally I think NXS glass is trash. I’ve got an NX8 1-8 and 2.5-20. Glass is considerably better than NXS, and the most important part is the reticle choices. I’m pretty sure they haven’t updated any of the reticles available in the NXS since the First World War. They EUE box is tight on both of mine, but not overly tight. It took me an extra 10 minutes mounting time get it absolutely perfect, and the rest has been history.
-
I have a couple different NF, I have the scope your looking to buy. The NXS works great for what your looking to do. I was shooting out regularly to 800 yards with it.
Side note, I have the MOAR-T, and as I get older need a heavier crosshair. So I'm looking to get the MOAR now. Keep that in mind.
Comment
-
I have an NXS 5.5-22x56 and an NX8 4-32x50. Here are my thoughts after using both all year on 2 different rifles, hunting and target shooting out to 3/4 mile:
- NXS is a proven tracking great scope, it's big and the glass at low light is meh at best. I think the eyebox is very forgiving for 95% of the zoom range - it's gets a little tight at 22x. It also has the goofy (for me) feature where the whole ocular turns when you zoom in, vs the NX8 that has the free moving zoom ring like most scopes. This really becomes an issue if you use scope caps.
- NX8 has noticably better glass than the NXS, it's like a mini-ATACR with smaller 20 moa turrets and 30mm tube. The eyebox is easier to look through on the 4-32x than my NXS. I personally really like the capped windage turret, as you don't have the issues with brass deflecting off of the windage turret like you do with the NXS and any other scope with a big tactical windage turret on the port side of the rifle.
I also went with the 4-32x after looking through the 2-20x side by side - the eyebox and parallax on the 2-20x is finicky and the glass really is noticably better on the 4-32. Also, if you go with the FFP, your wind holds are accurate at any power. And me personally, I believe most scopes have better resolution at a magnification below their max - so if you want to use 20x to shoot way out there, get a scope that has a high end 20% above that and get ffp so your subtentions are still correct.
Also, the weight and size difference between the 2-20x and 4-32 is literally 0.3 ounces and 1.4" longer.
Both are great scopes, but I'd encourage you to go to Cabela's or another store that has both in stock and physically twist the turrets and look through them before you buy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cb4128 View PostI have an NXS 5.5-22x56 and an NX8 4-32x50. Here are my thoughts after using both all year on 2 different rifles, hunting and target shooting out to 3/4 mile:
- NXS is a proven tracking great scope, it's big and the glass at low light is meh at best. I think the eyebox is very forgiving for 95% of the zoom range - it's gets a little tight at 22x. It also has the goofy (for me) feature where the whole ocular turns when you zoom in, vs the NX8 that has the free moving zoom ring like most scopes. This really becomes an issue if you use scope caps.
- NX8 has noticably better glass than the NXS, it's like a mini-ATACR with smaller 20 moa turrets and 30mm tube. The eyebox is easier to look through on the 4-32x than my NXS. I personally really like the capped windage turret, as you don't have the issues with brass deflecting off of the windage turret like you do with the NXS and any other scope with a big tactical windage turret on the port side of the rifle.
I also went with the 4-32x after looking through the 2-20x side by side - the eyebox and parallax on the 2-20x is finicky and the glass really is noticably better on the 4-32. Also, if you go with the FFP, your wind holds are accurate at any power. And me personally, I believe most scopes have better resolution at a magnification below their max - so if you want to use 20x to shoot way out there, get a scope that has a high end 20% above that and get ffp so your subtentions are still correct.
Also, the weight and size difference between the 2-20x and 4-32 is literally 0.3 ounces and 1.4" longer.
Both are great scopes, but I'd encourage you to go to Cabela's or another store that has both in stock and physically twist the turrets and look through them before you buy.
Comment
-
The 4-3/ reticle isn’t usable on low power nor is it usable in its higher range. Being FFP it gets super small and then super big. I found the eye box was tighter on the 4-32 than on the 2-20. Big time. The 2-20 is semi tight but I’m used to 34mm tubes and I run a kahles on my main gun. So I’m spoiled. Chad knows his optics. It’s interesting that we have two totally different opinions lol.
Comment
-
opinions
Originally posted by trophy8 View PostThe 4-3/ reticle isn’t usable on low power nor is it usable in its higher range. Being FFP it gets super small and then super big. I found the eye box was tighter on the 4-32 than on the 2-20. Big time. The 2-20 is semi tight but I’m used to 34mm tubes and I run a kahles on my main gun. So I’m spoiled. Chad knows his optics. It’s interesting that we have two totally different opinions lol.
If it was on a 6.5 prc or a varmint gun, I would definitely go with the 2-20x
Comment
Comment