The IG report is out

[MacDaddy67]

Nothingburger....

Just like I thought it would.....

Thses crooks protect each other at all costs

[SB09]

Yep. Doesn't surprise me at all.

[muzzlebrake]

Just like the hearings. Each side checkmates the other.

[Landrover]

Bwahahaha!!!! [emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[MacDaddy67]

No political bias......

Do they really beleive that voters really beleive that...
.they don't even care that you know they are corrupt

[MacDaddy67]

John Durham has come out and stated the he whole hardheartedly disagrees with the IG report and he investigation continues....
States that he has info that the IG has not seen

[100%TtId]

Meanwhile Rep Collins is ripping Daniel Goldman a new one right now in the hearing. Admitted Biden did a quid pro quo as part of U.S. policy with Burisma.

This is remarkable testimony.

[MacDaddy67]

Meanwhile Rep Collins is ripping Daniel Goldman a new one right now in the hearing. Admitted Biden did a quid pro quo as part of U.S. policy with Burisma.

This is remarkable testimony.

Yeah he did....it was Schiff...hence why he is not there....it took everything Goldman had not to throw him under the bus.....

Schiff might be in trouble

[Clay C]

There's a rumor/theory going around that the "Whistleblower" was actually an illegal wiretap.

[rtp]

The nothing burger everyone here pretty much expected. Hopefully Trump is re-elected and the truth finally comes out. There has been nothing but stall, distract and coverup for 4 years hoping they can run out the clock. Then it will be back to business as usual.

[100%TtId]

There's a rumor/theory going around that the "Whistleblower" was actually an illegal wiretap.

Being monitored by whom, I wonder?

If true, that IS treasonous.

[Bazo]

Yeah he did....it was Schiff...hence why he is not there....it took everything Goldman had not to throw him under the bus.....

Schiff might be in trouble

Yeah right...I have zero confidence in our government oversight.

[Clay C]

John Durham has come out and stated the he whole hardheartedly disagrees with the IG report and he investigation continues....
States that he has info that the IG has not seen

Yes, but I still doubt anything will be done. Barr is a swamp creature and was his first time around too.

If nothing else, this proves beyond doubt that our government is completely infiltrated and broken beyond repair.

[Clay C]

Check out this load of crap. Keep in mind that there is still no evidence that the DNC was hacked by the Russians.

E.W. "Bill" Priestap, who approved the case opening, told us that the combination of the FFG information and the FBI's ongoing cyber intrusion investigation of the July 2016 hacks of the Democratic National Committee's (DNC) emails, created a counterintelligence concern that the FBI was "obligated" to investigate. Priestap stated that he considered whether the FBI should conduct defensive briefings for the Trump campaign but ultimately decided that providing such briefings created the risk that "if someone on the campaign was engaged with the Russians, he/she would very likely change his/her tactics and/or otherwise seek to cover-up his/her activities, thereby preventing us from finding the truth."

And this one. Basically, because Strozk's boss (whom consulted with Strozk along with others) made the ultimate decision to start the investigation, Strozk's bias had nothing to do with it. What a load of manure.

We further found that while Strzok was directly involved in the decisions to open Crossfire Hurricane and the four individual cases, he was not the sole, or even the highest-level, decision maker as to any of those matters. As noted above, then CD AD Priestap, Strzok's supervisor, was the official who ultimately made the decision to open the investigation, and evidence reflected that this decision by Priestap was reached by consensus after multiple days of discussions and meetings that included Strzok and other leadership in CD, the FBI Deputy Director, the FBI General Counsel, and a FBI Deputy General Counsel. We concluded that Priestap's exercise of discretion in opening the investigation was in compliance with Department and FBI policies, and we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced his decision. We similarly found that, while the formal documentation opening each of the four individual investigations was approved by Strzok (as required by the DIOG)

[Clay C]

It's just laughable at this point.

"We identified at least 17 significant errors or omissions in the Carter Page FISA applications, and many additional errors in the Woods Procedures. These errors and omissions resulted from case agents providing wrong or incomplete infor mation to OI and failing to flag important issues for discussion. While we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of intentional misconduct on the part of the case agents who assisted OI in preparing the applications, or the agents and supervisors who performed the Woods Procedures, we also did not receive satisfactory explanations for the errors or problems we identified."