wow that is not good....sucks but what can u do!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
High priced AR buck
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by HUNTING_COACHReally, are these wardens really going to be like that? He actually checked it. Do you have pics of the buck? I think that is a case of a warden throwing his **** around to try to see how big it is. What a jerk? I mean, who does that. It is like giving a ticket for going 75 in a 70.
****** me off. That warden probably got beat up as a little kid and now he is taking it out on others, because he can.
In both cases the officer is just doing his job. He can't use discretion legally. It is what it is. 13" means 13" and 70 means 70.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Puggy625 View PostI agree with the AR's but with one minor tweek that maybe needs to be implemented. Keep the 13" rule, but allow maybe a 1/4" variance since it's so hard to judge (I also agree with the "if it's close, don't shoot" mentality). I mean come on, have an allowance to say you get "probation" for 2 years if you shoot one thats only 12 3/4, so if you get caught with another one smaller than 13" for two years, you get double fined. Something along that lines, or even a smaller fine if it's between 12 3/4 and 13". Just so people don't get slammed with major fines for one that's JUUUUUUSSSSSSSTTTTTTT under the limit.
Fire away........
Comment
-
I somewhat agree with AR, but everyone has to follow the rules. I have seen more bucks this year than in some years past, but none over 13". I don't feel that the GW should give any leeway on the measurement. 13" is 13". What I do think what the GW needs to take into consideration is the length of the deer's ears. In the rule book it states that a good way to live judge a deer is to have deer with ears in alert position, and if inside width is outside the ear tips, then more than likely it will measure over 13". The one buck on our lease that fit this description had one ear 2" shorter than the other. Measured right at 13".
I did hear of a case where a hunter took jaw bone to a biologist and had it aged and proved it was a 4.5 y/o deer and antlers were almost at their best. Judge was lenient on the fine.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HUNTING_COACHReally, are these wardens really going to be like that? He actually checked it. Do you have pics of the buck? I think that is a case of a warden throwing his **** around to try to see how big it is. What a jerk? I mean, who does that. It is like giving a ticket for going 75 in a 70.
****** me off. That warden probably got beat up as a little kid and now he is taking it out on others, because he can.
breaking the law.
I think its a case of the warden doing his job.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike D View Post
In both cases the officer is just doing his job. He can't use discretion legally. It is what it is.
I'm not a police officer/GW nor did I spend the night at a Holiday Inn Express, but I did retire five years ago as a 26 year GW.........does that count????
troy
Comment
-
Originally posted by DTala View Postcan you quote the law/reg/rule that states this???? Because it ain't so... Any and all LEOs can, and do, use discretion all the time. That buck is EXACTLY where officer discretion SHOULD of been used.
I'm not a police officer/GW nor did I spend the night at a Holiday Inn Express, but I did retire five years ago as a 26 year GW.........does that count????
troy
If the officer decides to do that then he does it at his own risk.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BigErn View Post75mph in 70,thats like keeping 15 fish,when the limit is 10!They are both
breaking the law.
I think its a case of the warden doing his job.
Comment
-
Really, are these wardens really going to be like that? He actually checked it. Do you have pics of the buck? I think that is a case of a warden throwing his **** around to try to see how big it is. What a jerk? I mean, who does that. It is like giving a ticket for going 75 in a 70.
****** me off. That warden probably got beat up as a little kid and now he is taking it out on others, because he can.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Phantom II View PostThis again...
it does stink but for the most part it is really working...
Originally posted by Roy D Mercer View PostI understand the frustration but the AR will have more benefit in the long run. The way I see it the game warden did not make the law but he is paid to enforce it. Maybe they will tweak the law and include a total BC score as a variable.
Originally posted by Keithb View PostWhat if the deers ears aren't 13".
Ears in alert position are approximately 13 inches apart and may be used to judge the inside spread. <-- straight from TPWD rule.
Comment
Comment