Originally posted by Burntorange BowhunterView Post
Just conversation.
What would you suggest we discuss?
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
It wasn’t about what Utah did or could do, it was about Texas finally had guys in position to make plays with healthy(ier) bodies. The difference in scheme allowed Texas to play fast and take advantage of the athletes they do have.
What ****** me off the most is Herman let this happen right under his nose. He had to baby sit the offense having its own struggles and let Orlando continue to run his stupid scheme over and over. When the most novice football fan point out the issues, that’s a problem. Herman gets all the blame for letting this happen. He better hit on these hires or his *** will be on a beach with his pockets stuffed of Texas buyout money.
It wasn’t about what Utah did or could do, it was about Texas finally had guys in position to make plays with healthy(ier) bodies. The difference in scheme allowed Texas to play fast and take advantage of the athletes they do have.
What ****** me off the most is Herman let this happen right under his nose. He had to baby sit the offense having its own struggles and let Orlando continue to run his stupid scheme over and over. When the most novice football fan point out the issues, that’s a problem. Herman gets all the blame for letting this happen. He better hit on these hires or his *** will be on a beach with his pockets stuffed of Texas buyout money.
Agree. Utah was not a "good team" but they were probably better than a couple of the teams Horns lost to. Will be interesting to see how well he hit on the hires, very little slack left in the rope at this point.
Comment