Just my luck owning property where an endangered species might live. I got a survey asking all kinds of questions. Basically wanting you to enter into an agreement with the state and feds to preserve or enhance houston toad habitat. There was a question and answer part and here's what I find interesting.
So the way I'm reading this you either enter into the agreement or they can force you to do whatever they want with "your" property. Ain't no way I'm agreeing to anything with any government agency. Welcome to socialism where you don't own anything. Pay your yearly rent and then have the government tell you what you can and can't do because of some god**** frog that is too stupid to change with the times.
Q: How will landowners benefit from this Safe Harbor Agreement?
A: The Agreement provides incentives to private landowners to ease their Endangered Species Act liability concerns while still allowing them the opportunity to actively participate in Houston toad recovery. In exchange for their recovery actions on behalf of the toad, participating property owners receive assurances from the Service that if they fulfill the conditions of the agreement, the Service will not require any additional or different management activities without their consent. In addition, at the end of the agreement period, participants may return the enrolled property to the baseline conditions that existed at the beginning of the agreement
A: The Agreement provides incentives to private landowners to ease their Endangered Species Act liability concerns while still allowing them the opportunity to actively participate in Houston toad recovery. In exchange for their recovery actions on behalf of the toad, participating property owners receive assurances from the Service that if they fulfill the conditions of the agreement, the Service will not require any additional or different management activities without their consent. In addition, at the end of the agreement period, participants may return the enrolled property to the baseline conditions that existed at the beginning of the agreement
Comment