Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
TPWD update
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ultrastealth View Post"Modify the definitions of “buck deer” and “antlerless deer.”
Modify the proof of sex requirements for harvested buck deer."
It would have been nice if they'd been more specific.
You have to take into consideration those buck deer identifying as antlerless and vice versa. Gender fluidity in whitetail deer is a real thing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ultrastealth View Post"Modify the definitions of “buck deer” and “antlerless deer.”
Modify the proof of sex requirements for harvested buck deer."
It would have been nice if they'd been more specific.
“In order to be as clear and specific as possible as to the specific types of animals that bag limits, tagging requirements, and proof-of-sex rules for “buck” and “antlerless” apply to, the proposed amendment would clarify that the term “antlerless deer” means a deer having no antler point (a projection extending at least one inch from the edge of a main beam or another tine, which includes the tip of a main beam) protruding through the skin or a buck deer that has completely shed its antlers. The proposed amendment would alter the definition of “buck deer” to apply the same standard; a buck deer is a deer having an antler point protruding through the skin or a deer having antler growth in velvet of greater than one inch”
Comment
-
Originally posted by skeeter View Postseems easier to me.
buck deer= with antlers more than 1 inch
antlerless= no antlers.
not too concerned with proof of sex, just "does it have horns or not?"
Ive seen does with horns. Ive seen bucks with no nutz and no horns. If its got horns tag as a buck.
They don't want it to read this way...simple and easy.
They want to change all the rules and confuse everyone, that way they can catch an honest man and fine him for something!!
Comment
Comment