It doesn’t get any closer than this!

[TX03RUBI]

Seekins Havak with a NF NX8 2.5-20x50 with Seekins .92 rings. That’s as close as it’ll get without touching right there. It’s not set exactly where I want it yet, so still a bit more tweaking. It’ll clear though.

[gfulton]

Looks like a I/4" to me, I wouldn't sweat it.

[TX03RUBI]

Looks like a I/4" to me, I wouldn't sweat it.

Look at the ocular. It’s barely a paper width. The scope needs to come back about an 1/8th or slightly more, but not enough for the ocular you clear the rail with shorter rings.

[twosixteens]

Man that is tight I wouldn’t run it that tight you get a stray dog hair in there and it would probably stick

[lovemylegacy]

That would be an RCH

[kae006]

Not enough eye relief if you moved the whole thing back an inch and went with lower rings?

[GarGuy]

Scope looks too far forward. Is eye relief right for you?

[Radar]

Trophy8 said

[BBReezen]

Take the scope off and run that back part of the base across the table Triner for a while. That’ll get you some clearance

[Cajun Blake]

I'd be doing this to remove a few thousandths

[trophy8]

Trophy8 said

Pinche Anthony

[TX03RUBI]

Not enough eye relief if you moved the whole thing back an inch and went with lower rings?

I moved it back enough to clear the rail and it was too far back. I need it move it back less than 1/4”, but it won’t be enough to clear.

[TX03RUBI]

I moved it back where it fits me, and still not enough to clear any shorter rings. This rifle isn’t it’s forever home either. I normally run an ATACR 4-16x42 on this rifle, and this NX8 belongs to a 22 Creedmoor that I’m waiting for the stock. It’s sporting a MTU profile carbon barrel, and I doubt any shorter rings would work with the barrel if if I could clear the rail.

[RifleBowPistol]

I agree with Blake, mill the rail. Easy fix.

[TX03RUBI]

Why would I mill it? It’s not making contact, and it fits where I want it. No fix is needed.