That literally said nothing about Texas, or anything the rest of us didn't already know. And it's "here".
I was aking them to win 10 before the season started, I wish it hadn't taken until the bowl game to get it done, but if you're gonna get beat by maryland then I guess you have to adjust expectations. Not a bad 2nd season, all in all. The sugar bowl win was greatness on a big stage, and back to the best in the state, tons of fun.
“When I was at Texas, we had guys who weren’t even being recruited and when they committed to us, suddenly they were five stars. That happened 100 percent,” he said. “What I’m saying is, it’s not about the ranking, it’s about who’s recruiting you. That, in my opinion, is a huge indictment on the ranking system.”
Here's the quote about Texas from about half way down the page, nothing too controversial it seems to me.
“When I was at Texas, we had guys who weren’t even being recruited and when they committed to us, suddenly they were five stars. That happened 100 percent,” he said. “What I’m saying is, it’s not about the ranking, it’s about who’s recruiting you. That, in my opinion, is a huge indictment on the ranking system.”
Here's the quote about Texas from about half way down the page, nothing too controversial it seems to me.
“When I was at Texas, we had guys who weren’t even being recruited and when they committed to us, suddenly they were five stars. That happened 100 percent,” he said. “What I’m saying is, it’s not about the ranking, it’s about who’s recruiting you. That, in my opinion, is a huge indictment on the ranking system.”
Here's the quote about Texas from about half way down the page, nothing too controversial it seems to me.
Ah, mine didn't load the whole page the first time. I'm sure that probably happened, and I'm sure it probably doesn't nearly as much anymore with EVERYONE poaching the state's talent. I agree with him though, and have for years. Ranking recruiting classes before they step on the field is stupid, and it always has been.
Wouldn't this alleged "manipulation" of recruit rankings apply to A&M also?
I think it happens with everyone, off the radar kids pick up big offer and then all of a sudden everyone takes notice and rankings rise.
But also I think there is something to be said that during Texas's good stretch that it was very much assumed that since Texas offered them they must be studs, compared to when it seems that to the end of Brown's tenure his player evaluation fell off.
I think it happens with everyone, off the radar kids pick up big offer and then all of a sudden everyone takes notice and rankings rise.
But also I think there is something to be said that during Texas's good stretch that it was very much assumed that since Texas offered them they must be studs, compared to when it seems that to the end of Brown's tenure his player evaluation fell off.
Weird that Stoops was stealing a bunch of talent then too, but the same phenomenon did not hold true for him...or did it? i really don't remember.
“When I was at Texas, we had guys who weren’t even being recruited and when they committed to us, suddenly they were five stars. That happened 100 percent,” he said. “What I’m saying is, it’s not about the ranking, it’s about who’s recruiting you. That, in my opinion, is a huge indictment on the ranking system.”
Here's the quote about Texas from about half way down the page, nothing too controversial it seems to me.
I think it happens with everyone, off the radar kids pick up big offer and then all of a sudden everyone takes notice and rankings rise.
But also I think there is something to be said that during Texas's good stretch that it was very much assumed that since Texas offered them they must be studs, compared to when it seems that to the end of Brown's tenure his player evaluation fell off.
Aggie is that ate up with Texas that y'all are bringing up star rankings from the days of Mack?
Comment