Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Amber Guyger

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    That neighbor had diet on the Clinton's...

    What are the odds he is murdered within 4 days of testifying.....
    Hmmmmmm

    Comment


      Originally posted by cowman View Post
      Why did they try to use mistake in fact? Why did that defense not go their way?
      I'll answer these 2.
      "Why did they try to use mistake in fact?"
      They used it because it should've got her off in this case. Combined w/Castle Doctrine, she should've walked.
      "Why did that defense not go their way?"
      Because the jury couldn't comprehend what Mistake Of Fact actually means, how to apply it or the gravity of it.
      Mistake of Fact: She was in her apartment (she wasn't but she truly believed she was & that's the beauty of Mistake of Fact).
      Castle Doctrine: "stand your ground" type situation. She had every right to shoot someone in her apartment.
      Having said all that;
      she walks into her apartment & shoots a stranger in her apartment = not guilty of murder & almost certainly not guilty of manslaughter.

      It's hard for people to wrap their mind around Mistake of Fact, including people in this thread, & that's why their defense failed.

      Comment


        Originally posted by LFD2037 View Post
        I'll answer these 2.
        "Why did they try to use mistake in fact?"
        They used it because it should've got her off in this case. Combined w/Castle Doctrine, she should've walked.
        "Why did that defense not go their way?"
        Because the jury couldn't comprehend what Mistake Of Fact actually means, how to apply it or the gravity of it.
        Mistake of Fact: She was in her apartment (she wasn't but she truly believed she was & that's the beauty of Mistake of Fact).
        Castle Doctrine: "stand your ground" type situation. She had every right to shoot someone in her apartment.
        Having said all that;
        she walks into her apartment & shoots a stranger in her apartment = not guilty of murder & almost certainly not guilty of manslaughter.

        It's hard for people to wrap their mind around Mistake of Fact, including people in this thread, & that's why their defense failed.
        The law requires a reasonableness standard to use MOF. There was definitely enough evidence for a jury to conclude Guyger was being unreasonable if she thought she was standing inside her own apartment.

        Comment


          Originally posted by LFD2037 View Post
          I'll answer these 2.
          "Why did they try to use mistake in fact?"
          They used it because it should've got her off in this case. Combined w/Castle Doctrine, she should've walked.
          "Why did that defense not go their way?"
          Because the jury couldn't comprehend what Mistake Of Fact actually means, how to apply it or the gravity of it.
          Mistake of Fact: She was in her apartment (she wasn't but she truly believed she was & that's the beauty of Mistake of Fact).
          Castle Doctrine: "stand your ground" type situation. She had every right to shoot someone in her apartment.
          Having said all that;
          she walks into her apartment & shoots a stranger in her apartment = not guilty of murder & almost certainly not guilty of manslaughter.

          It's hard for people to wrap their mind around Mistake of Fact, including people in this thread, & that's why their defense failed.
          i think the jury also misinterpreted her "yes, i intended to kill him" answer. if the jury didnt there sure have been a lot of people on social media that did.

          Comment


            Originally posted by 35remington View Post
            The law requires a reasonableness standard to use MOF. There was definitely enough evidence for a jury to conclude Guyger was being unreasonable if she thought she was standing inside her own apartment.
            if they were so convinced that she committed murder, and is a murderer, than why only 10 years?

            Comment


              Originally posted by ctom87 View Post
              Not every day a key witness turns up dead after the defense has already been sentenced. This is going to turn into a movie in a few years.
              Drug deal gone bad.

              3 suspects in custody.

              Comment


                Sounds like a reputable witness

                Comment


                  The short version of what happened according to one of the perps. Brown offers to sell drugs to guy from Louisiana who shows up with two other guys. Things went sideways and Brown shoots one of them and they shoot back. Brown dies, guy he shot survives and goes to the hospital where he was arrested and rats on the other two, who have warrants out for them now. They found 12 pounds of pot in Browns apartment. The DPD conspiracy never made sense. His testimony did not convict Guyger - hers did. Brown was a neighbor who just said he heard voices and shots fired.
                  Last edited by jerp; 10-08-2019, 01:16 PM.

                  Comment


                    Apparently this guy was shot a year or so back outside a strip club, and was present when someone else was shot a few years ago.

                    THAT is a Dallas prosecutors style of credible witness!

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by LFD2037 View Post
                      I'll answer these 2.
                      "Why did they try to use mistake in fact?"
                      They used it because it should've got her off in this case. Combined w/Castle Doctrine, she should've walked.
                      "Why did that defense not go their way?"
                      Because the jury couldn't comprehend what Mistake Of Fact actually means, how to apply it or the gravity of it.
                      Mistake of Fact: She was in her apartment (she wasn't but she truly believed she was & that's the beauty of Mistake of Fact).
                      Castle Doctrine: "stand your ground" type situation. She had every right to shoot someone in her apartment.
                      Having said all that;
                      she walks into her apartment & shoots a stranger in her apartment = not guilty of murder & almost certainly not guilty of manslaughter.

                      It's hard for people to wrap their mind around Mistake of Fact, including people in this thread, & that's why their defense failed.
                      OR her defense could have failed simply because the jury didn't believe it was a "Mistake" at all, like some people in this thread..

                      Comment


                        Saddest part is it was over 12 pounds of grass, which in reality is worthless in the wonderful world of narco traffickers.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Dale Moser View Post
                          Apparently this guy was shot a year or so back outside a strip club, and was present when someone else was shot a few years ago.

                          THAT is a Dallas prosecutors style of credible witness!
                          He wore a DragonBall Z t-shirt and a pair of swimming trunks to testify in a murder case. Not sure what caliber of a person does that but I guess we’re finding out.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by jshouse View Post
                            if they were so convinced that she committed murder, and is a murderer, than why only 10 years?
                            Read and learn about compromise verdicts by starting here: https://definitions.uslegal.com/c/compromise-verdict/

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by 35remington View Post
                              Read and learn about compromise verdicts by starting here: https://definitions.uslegal.com/c/compromise-verdict/
                              Compromise. Interesting. Thanks.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Dale Moser View Post
                                Apparently this guy was shot a year or so back outside a strip club, and was present when someone else was shot a few years ago.

                                THAT is a Dallas prosecutors style of credible witness!
                                What Are you trying to say? I was shot at outside a strip club in 1985.

                                Luckily for me he missed(he was still dizzy from me bouncing his head off the cigarette machine on the way out the door). Ladies Galore at 2050 Cheshire Bridge Road in Atlanta. Good times.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X