Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Austin Court of Appeals Rules Breeder Deer are NOT Private Property

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Austin Court of Appeals Rules Breeder Deer are NOT Private Property

    A recent decision from the Austin Court of Appeals in Bailey v. Smith, is important for many Texas landowners involved in the business of raising deer.  This case addressed the issue of whether breeder deer–raised by persons with the required TPWD permit–are considered private property of the deer breeder or are owned by the State. One note here–this case also addressed a number of other technical legal issues such as sovereign immunity, ultra vires action of state officials, and attorney’s fees awards.  This blog post will not discuss these... Read More →


    Interesting article...

    #2
    Just saw that also. Interesting read.

    Comment


      #3
      Thanks for posting.

      Comment


        #4
        Seems pretty straightforward... and the right call by both the trial and appellate courts.

        Comment


          #5
          Now here is the next question since they are property of the state, how are they able to sell them? They legally do not own them according to the state law.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by bowaddict40 View Post
            Now here is the next question since they are property of the state, how are they able to sell them? They legally do not own them according to the state law.


            X2


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

            Comment


              #7
              Because nobody has challenged the legality of selling deer and there aren't any laws making it expressly illegal.

              Comment


                #8
                They're not selling the deer, they're changing you to hunt their land....." as they're measuring the deer to charge you by the inch"
                Last edited by Mexico; 07-15-2019, 06:05 PM.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by bowaddict40 View Post
                  Now here is the next question since they are property of the state, how are they able to sell them? They legally do not own them according to the state law.
                  Cuz it says so explicitly in the law? It was quoted in the article.

                  Texas Parks Code 43.357
                  (a) The holder of a valid deer breeder's permit may:
                  (2) sell, transfer to another person, or hold in captivity live breeder deer for the purpose of propagation or sale.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    About to get real interesting...

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Just as it was when everyone signed up for the program.


                      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Stonecold69 View Post
                        About to get real interesting...
                        Not really... pretty cut and dried.
                        There is no way in hell TPWD or any reasonable court is going to let breeders off the hook for CWD testing and reporting.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          The state does not want ownership of deer, they don't want to pay for the property damage and lawsuits that would come from all the lawyers representing car crash victims

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I hope that this isn't the deer breeder near Sabinal that has had so many cases of CWD. If it is, and they win, Katy bar the door.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by bowaddict40 View Post
                              Now here is the next question since they are property of the state, how are they able to sell them? They legally do not own them according to the state law.


                              In for the answer! Where do we draw the line? Exotics?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X