if the owner could prove a state record buck frequented the land, it would be more valuable, no? hence, an illegally taken state record missing would damage the value, right?
not to mention, the owner was going to sell it as unhunted for x years. but mr entitled and his public case of chronic poaching, squashed that opportunity.
not to mention, the owner was going to sell it as unhunted for x years. but mr entitled and his public case of chronic poaching, squashed that opportunity.
Comment