Never Agreed With Inside Spread.

[Duckologist]

It's the universal mass measurement regardless of points that is out of whack...

Every rack is judged the same, nothin is out of whack

[tvc184]

Mass is accounted for in the mass measurements, no need to add extra credit for mass.

That is correct. There is already a measurement for mass. The circumference on the main beam is measured up to several times.

[Blackmouth]

I don't really see much issue with it, regardless of mass. Visually a 21" wide deer is much bigger looking than a 16" wide deer, but on the score sheet it's only a 5" difference. Mass measurements will give the heavier deer the score he needs.

Not sure about current times but I think the old MLD Level 3 overruled any antler restrictions.

Gross score is far superior to net, why deduct a buck if he isn't symmetrical or slick?

[Artos]

Every rack is judged the same, nothin is out of whack

Nope...an 8pt getting the same # of mass measurements as a 16pt is not being judged equally at all. It's the system we have but the mass portion is indeed Whacked.

[curtintex]

And now I’m thinking about boobies

Now? Heck, I was thinking about them when I opened this thread, this morning at breakfast, while reading the news, while at the UPS Store and most of the time I was driving to run errands.

[curtintex]

You would still look [emoji16]

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

You know what they say…. “If you’ve seen one set, you want to see all the rest of ‘em”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Bisch]

No sir. My math isn’t wrong. The point I’m trying to make is that 2 deer have an equal 20” outside spread measurement. One has 20” of mass and the other 40”. The pencil horn will receive a better spread credit on the score sheet.

Yeah, but he also gets 20” more mass!!

To me, SCI had it right better than B&C/P&Y. Give the deer credit for everything it grew!

Deductions are stupid, and nets are for fishing!!!!!

Bisch


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Gumbo Man]

Yeah, but he also gets 20” more mass!!

To me, SCI had it right better than B&C/P&Y. Give the deer credit for everything it grew!

Deductions are stupid, and nets are for fishing!!!!!

Bisch


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Tru Dat!!

[sambo73]

You know what they say…. “If you’ve seen one set, you want to see all the rest of ‘em”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

According to Ron White[emoji23]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[DaveC]

Never Agreed With Inside Spread.

I hunted with some fellas I’m pretty sure were adding both.
Anytime they threw out a score it’d be about 15” higher than I was seeing.

Don’t matter enough to ask, dead tagged deer on ice was the end result either way.


And to the derail- shadow casters vs pepperonies or somewhere in between ?- I’m unbiased, but the box of chocolates surprise always added to the moment of enlightenment.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Hills of Texas]

It’s an inch or two. I’ve seen multiple b&c scores measure the same set of antlers and all get different scores. The only way to really do it accurately across the board would be water displacement. A big tub with measurements on the side fill it with water, submerge all antler and record score.

[SmTx]

Y'all could just take it back to the old days.

I shot a buck

cool how many points?

8

how wide?

18"

dang that's a nice deer!

[bullets13]

Mass is accounted for in the mass measurements, no need to add extra credit for mass.

this

[hpdrifter]

It’s an inch or two. I’ve seen multiple b&c scores measure the same set of antlers and all get different scores. The only way to really do it accurately across the board would be water displacement. A big tub with measurements on the side fill it with water, submerge all antler and record score.

then you get down to skull cut.

498 cc's would be weird!

[Jon B]

I agree. Inside antler spread and bra sizes. All messed up. I mean everyone celebrates double Ds but heck a big ol fat gal can have them while really perky Cs on a fit gal are far superior. Agree???? Its just unfair and we should start a protest.

this guy gets it!