I want to know if you think I could legally tag this buck as having one unbranched antler? I'm thinking he has 3 beams and one of them is considered unbranched? Thoughts?
Attached Files
-
-
No, but his widest point is greater than 13” so it would be your trophy -
Super BranchedComment
-
No.Comment
-
Does this buck qualify as having an unbranched antler???
I think any antlered deer only has two antlers in the eyes of the game warden.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
He might be connected at the roots.
Comment
-
No, but easily 13”Comment
-
The regs say that the 13" rule doesn't apply to a buck with an unbranched antler. Maybe i'm just interpreting it wrong.Originally posted by kd350 View PostComment
-
Not unbranched but 13”. I’d wack’em just cause it’s cool.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Yea he may be. I can't get any closer pics of him. Was hoping that third antler was separate from that left beam. He's actually been missing for almost 1.5 months and just showed back up last nightOriginally posted by Texas Grown View PostHe might be connected at the roots.Comment
-
It means if he has an unbranched antler the 13” rule doesn’t apply. But he’s 13” so you all good!Originally posted by corps2010 View PostComment
-
Lots of folks missing your point and question. If that beam comes from an independent pedicle, you can tag him as unbranched and still kill your other deer. I'm ccx afraid it is fused though.Comment
-
Sorry if you took me seriously. But I wasn't being serious.
Comment
-
no worries!Originally posted by Texas Grown View PostSorry if you took me seriously. But I wasn't being serious.Comment
-
Comment