Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shane Vaughn - We Win In The End

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Shane Vaughn - We Win In The End

    Just saw this....


    Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.

    #2
    Originally posted by Johnny Dangerr View Post
    Yep! 37-13, maybe less than 37 as we are seeing some republican ran states not being on the up and up. My guess, as Sydney Powell said, there are some republican state officials that have stock in Dominion.

    Comment


      #3
      Cant see the link but is he one of the guys saying just prove fraud to get it to 269 v 269?

      Here's the problem. If all you had to do was just prove fraud, couldn't that be Republican or democrat fraud then?

      Looks like some shenanigans got pulled by Republicans in some deep blue states (branfords law analysis). Ding dongs.

      Anyway, wouldnt it be easier for trump to identify those Republicans that pulled those shenanigans and give them over as sacrificial lambs, while they testify to the fraud they committed? Seems easier than getting the evidence from the other side, if the trump legal team was serious about this just prove fraud theory.

      Just thinking out loud here...

      Comment


        #4
        I hope it holds true but, according to the comments below it, an attorney is saying it’s not quite right.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by camoclad View Post
          Cant see the link but is he one of the guys saying just prove fraud to get it to 269 v 269?

          Here's the problem. If all you had to do was just prove fraud, couldn't that be Republican or democrat fraud then?

          Looks like some shenanigans got pulled by Republicans in some deep blue states (branfords law analysis). Ding dongs.

          Anyway, wouldnt it be easier for trump to identify those Republicans that pulled those shenanigans and give them over as sacrificial lambs, while they testify to the fraud they committed? Seems easier than getting the evidence from the other side, if the trump legal team was serious about this just prove fraud theory.

          Just thinking out loud here...
          I think we all need to step back and chill out.
          What's going is beyond our comprehension.
          Trumps playing on a chess board with 256 squares, and half the pieces we've never seen before.
          We all say, well, give us proof, tell us something, etc...
          There's a reason the game is so silent.
          As Moser put it in another thread when he posed the question, "How do you want to win?".
          If Trumps the man we think he is, then we gotta trust him at this point, cuz you and me, we are idiots just guessing.
          All this guessing starts a seed of doubt....
          Keep the faith, hold the line, and TRUMP 20202!!!!!!!!

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by camoclad View Post
            Cant see the link but is he one of the guys saying just prove fraud to get it to 269 v 269?

            Here's the problem. If all you had to do was just prove fraud, couldn't that be Republican or democrat fraud then?

            Looks like some shenanigans got pulled by Republicans in some deep blue states (branfords law analysis). Ding dongs.

            Anyway, wouldnt it be easier for trump to identify those Republicans that pulled those shenanigans and give them over as sacrificial lambs, while they testify to the fraud they committed? Seems easier than getting the evidence from the other side, if the trump legal team was serious about this just prove fraud theory.

            Just thinking out loud here...
            No, its Benford’s law, and it shows irregularities in the democrat numbers, not the Republican.

            Comment


              #8
              That guy in the video said the Lower House, the House o' Representin', has 475 members. It's 435. Just clarification.

              I don't know what the plan is to overcome this election fraud, but I just can't imagine the king of the long game, DJT, wasn't prepared for this tyranny.

              Comment


                #9
                He seems to be under the impression that somehow the President not conceding will keep the electors from voting even if the lawsuits fail? Concessions aren't written into the constitution, so they're legally meaningless. You can concede, get 270 votes, and you're still (by law) the President. You're welcome to resign afterward and let your VP take the job.

                Trump would need his lawsuits to succeed to have any hope of maintaining his office. The result of said lawsuits would require enough votes either thrown out for Biden or tallied in Trump's favor allowing him to win swing states or get a tie.

                And for those hoping for it, there is no means for the supreme court to invalidate an entire state's vote or the entire election.

                Comment


                  #10
                  Gotta love these TBH lawyers that don't know come here from sic um

                  Comment


                    #11
                    Deny Biden’s 270 angle...stupid newsmax premium news??


                    Comment


                      #12
                      Originally posted by Artos View Post
                      Deny Biden’s 270 angle...stupid newsmax premium news??


                      https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/997053/381
                      This looks like a copy of that article without having to pay for it.

                      https://www.wbap.com/news/dershowitz...tion-in-house/

                      I agree with Dershowitz that it probably part of the Trump strategy and is possible however improbable. He'd need to have some major successes in court to keep multiple states from certifying their elections. So far they haven't gotten far.

                      Comment


                        #13
                        This depends on states not certifying their vote. If they are able to certify their vote then things get strange. Also this author compares the 1800's to today. The 1800's did not have an instant media like we do today. Today we have a political party that is using the media and the internet to influence and suppress thought. Never Trumpers, big tech and the media are now working to modify thought by modifying speech. BLM, ANTIFA are all bullying people to obey their way of thinking of suffer physical consequences. This changes things significantly.
                        Also I thought we had an amendment after the 12th, that 'upgraded' the 12th.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X