Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alexandrai Ocasio-Cortez new Green deal

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by MadHatter View Post
    According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world's volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide.

    This came from our own team, some of the most brilliant people in the world, not slanted stories like you drug up out of the guardian
    I can give you more references if needed.



    You sir totally missed the point and flew off into left field, just like a liberal. You also have very little understanding or knowledge of our current state. The food industry is running you straight down the socialist pipe so fast it's unbelievable and you and millions of others are totally missing it.
    I don't give 2 sh$ts about a party, when it should be common sense. We have multitude of people trying to start a revolution in the food movement. From the way its grown, to the way its sourced, to the way its sold. Healthy ya know, as the rates of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and OBESITY go up. Vegan people, people who only eat whole food, people who tout organic etc.. What do you and your ilk do, make fun of em, and they most assuredly must be a liberal. Meanwhile, all you eat is processed foods, made by the man, put in a store for you to buy, at there price, when its available. You support this 100%. Its my right to drink a 1000oz coke if I want, meanwhile your fatazz is breaking the healthcare industry, supporting big pharma, and your standing over here preaching against it. Unbelievable. Today's food is much like doing meth, but because it's food, everyone draws this bold line and refuses to see the similarities and what's going on.
    If I gave your kid a cigarette you would lose your mind, hand your kid a hot dog and no big deal, yet there they both are almost side by side in the FDAs list of known human carcinogens.
    So in the end, your way is going to put you in a line waiting for food, or drugs because you and society as a whole have no way to get it without the man.

    As far as electric cars etc.., do we just rape nature until it's gone and then say good luck kids? Or do you believe we'll magically never run out of fossil fuels? Tell me which way we should look? Or should we, for the first time in history, just quit? This is it folks, we've found it, no need to ever go anyfurther

    Just so were clear, Global Warming is real 100%, the only debatable question is, is man causing it.
    Your theory statement means nothing in scientific terms.
    Gravity is a theory.
    Just a tiny bit of reading from some uneducated liberals for you https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

    Y'all need to give up on this country though, and the whole being on the good side thing.
    Republicans are every bit as ridiculous as the liberals, just a different side of the coin. Every argument that could be made for them can be made for y'all good or bad.
    The 2 parties have grown so far apart, you've past the point of turning back. All common sense has been lost on both sides, to the point of simply fulfilling MY agenda. No one looks or reasons objectively anymore, simply subjectively.
    One of the most profound statements I've ever heard came from Ben Carson in a speech he gave for something..
    He was talking about the US as if it were a eagle. It has a right wing, and a left wing, and enable for the Eagle to soar, both wings must work together in unison.
    Lemme know the next time working in unison with a liberal crosses your mind.
    But like I said, could care less about party affiliation, these things should be common sense, something all men work towards as a whole, it shouldn't even be a political thing, but it is, and that's what is killing us.
    So, what's your theory on the hundreds or thousands of heating and cooling cycles before the industrial revolution?
    You make a good argument for pollution but not so much on the climate chang thing. There have been many multiple articles written about data being manipulated to show a result the climate alarmist want to see. There are thousands of scientist who dont believe any of the man made warming data. Since the climate has gone through huge cycles in the past many scientists believe it has more to do with sun spots....and that seems logical to me.
    Humans pollute, America is better than most developed or developing countries on earth about cleaning up our pollution, preventing it.

    Comment


      #92
      Just ordered a book, that sounds interesting, on this subject. Called Inconvenient Facts.
      Some excerpts


      A wise man’s heart inclines to the right, but the heart of a fool to the left.
      Ecclesiastes 10:2

      Comment


        #93
        Historical records of glacial retreat and sea-level rise confirm that our current warming trend started long before significant carbon dioxide began being ad...



        A wise man’s heart inclines to the right, but the heart of a fool to the left.
        Ecclesiastes 10:2

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by bps3040 View Post
          Just ordered a book, that sounds interesting, on this subject. Called Inconvenient Facts.
          Some excerpts


          A wise man’s heart inclines to the right, but the heart of a fool to the left.
          Ecclesiastes 10:2
          Right there in the last picture, they admit things are warming up. That's global warming. The term GW doesn't mean man made or anything of the sort, simply that the atmosphere is steadily getting warmer. Lots on here don't believe even that is real.
          The earth's cycles weve known about for some time, that's rudimentary knowledge from 8th grade, and dinosaurs.
          Are we the problem for the current state of things though?
          How did scientists from virtually every country on earth start agreeing on this? The most plausible reason vs your argument, is, it had to be to help the Democratic party.
          It makes no sense. This worldwide thing, backed by almost every country on earth, is hoax. Wow. We can't get 2 countries to agree on anything, but somehow, someone convinced almost every country on this. Talk about conspiracy theory.
          Fly wise you say I make a good point toward pollution.
          What is our contribution to GW if it's not pollution.
          Were are destroying nature faster than it can fix itself, and even in today's age of instant information some refuse to see this.
          We once had a great Republican, with immenseforesight, thought and vision. His name was Teddy Roosevelt.
          Think about what if. What if he hadn't done what he did, and today's thought had of pervaded unchecked.
          No Yellowstone, no Yosemite, on and on and on. None of that existed today, because drill baby drill was the mindset.
          It could have happened, I'm glad it didn't.
          Nature is something special, but it's true beauty is being lost by a new mindset, as we pull ever further away from it.
          Then you look at how we already have a man made chemical in every human on earth, look at the MTS weve torn down, the things we dump in the water, etc. Multiplied by the billions worldwide, yet people believe weve have no impact.
          It plain and simple, the wrong mindset, when looking into the future.

          Comment


            #95
            Originally posted by MadHatter View Post
            Right there in the last picture, they admit things are warming up. That's global warming. The term GW doesn't mean man made or anything of the sort, simply that the atmosphere is steadily getting warmer. Lots on here don't believe even that is real.
            The earth's cycles weve known about for some time, that's rudimentary knowledge from 8th grade, and dinosaurs.
            Are we the problem for the current state of things though?
            How did scientists from virtually every country on earth start agreeing on this? The most plausible reason vs your argument, is, it had to be to help the Democratic party.
            It makes no sense. This worldwide thing, backed by almost every country on earth, is hoax. Wow. We can't get 2 countries to agree on anything, but somehow, someone convinced almost every country on this. Talk about conspiracy theory.
            Fly wise you say I make a good point toward pollution.
            What is our contribution to GW if it's not pollution.
            Were are destroying nature faster than it can fix itself, and even in today's age of instant information some refuse to see this.
            We once had a great Republican, with immenseforesight, thought and vision. His name was Teddy Roosevelt.
            Think about what if. What if he hadn't done what he did, and today's thought had of pervaded unchecked.
            No Yellowstone, no Yosemite, on and on and on. None of that existed today, because drill baby drill was the mindset.
            It could have happened, I'm glad it didn't.
            Nature is something special, but it's true beauty is being lost by a new mindset, as we pull ever further away from it.
            Then you look at how we already have a man made chemical in every human on earth, look at the MTS weve torn down, the things we dump in the water, etc. Multiplied by the billions worldwide, yet people believe weve have no impact.
            It plain and simple, the wrong mindset, when looking into the future.
            What do you think about the Dems and the Global Community wanting to make Global Warming a tax/economic redistribution event? See when money becomes the motivating factor, all credibility is lost.

            Comment


              #96
              Ok, let’s say that we actually are having a significant impact, if this is true, then recent articles suggesting less emissions results in more tropical storms/hurricanes (https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...=.6c7642d62a21). So as we do our best to reverse or slow global warming we should be telling the people of the tropics, “Too bad for you. If you don’t leave, you’ll probably die.”

              And if we’re not causing it, is our technology and scientific understanding really great enough to combat it? Maybe I’m pessimistic but I doubt it.
              Last edited by donpablo; 02-23-2019, 01:06 PM.

              Comment


                #97
                Originally posted by MadHatter View Post
                Right there in the last picture, they admit things are warming up. That's global warming. The term GW doesn't mean man made or anything of the sort, simply that the atmosphere is steadily getting warmer. Lots on here don't believe even that is real.
                The earth's cycles weve known about for some time, that's rudimentary knowledge from 8th grade, and dinosaurs.
                Are we the problem for the current state of things though?
                How did scientists from virtually every country on earth start agreeing on this? The most plausible reason vs your argument, is, it had to be to help the Democratic party.
                It makes no sense. This worldwide thing, backed by almost every country on earth, is hoax. Wow. We can't get 2 countries to agree on anything, but somehow, someone convinced almost every country on this. Talk about conspiracy theory.
                Fly wise you say I make a good point toward pollution.
                What is our contribution to GW if it's not pollution.
                Were are destroying nature faster than it can fix itself, and even in today's age of instant information some refuse to see this.
                We once had a great Republican, with immenseforesight, thought and vision. His name was Teddy Roosevelt.
                Think about what if. What if he hadn't done what he did, and today's thought had of pervaded unchecked.
                No Yellowstone, no Yosemite, on and on and on. None of that existed today, because drill baby drill was the mindset.
                It could have happened, I'm glad it didn't.
                Nature is something special, but it's true beauty is being lost by a new mindset, as we pull ever further away from it.
                Then you look at how we already have a man made chemical in every human on earth, look at the MTS weve torn down, the things we dump in the water, etc. Multiplied by the billions worldwide, yet people believe weve have no impact.
                It plain and simple, the wrong mindset, when looking into the future.
                The point isn’t whether this is some Dem conspiracy. The point is historical science data proves man isn’t the cause. Spending billions of dollars to slow a natural process is just stupid, unless you are the one receiving the funds... ie the climate scientists who are pushing the agenda

                Comment


                  #98
                  Originally posted by MadHatter View Post

                  Cow farts, it is a real concern. You can laugh, pretend to be ignorant, poke fun, etc...but greenhouse gasses from cows farting in the US, on and all grain diet, adds up to more Co2 than all combustible engines in the US combined.
                  So it's US warming and not Global warming? CO2? What u gonna do about volcanos?

                  Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

                  Comment


                    #99
                    John Coleman Founder of the Weather Channel on CNN

                    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GijPX96_5uU"]Weather Channel founder John Coleman destroys CNN over global warming. "There is No Global Warming!" - YouTube[/ame]

                    Comment


                      I just farted am I going to be exterminated with the cows

                      Comment


                        [QUOTE=MadHatter;14011416]Right there in the last picture, they admit things are warming up. That's global warming. The term GW doesn't mean man made or anything of the sort, simply that the atmosphere is steadily getting warmer. Lots on here don't believe even that is real.
                        The earth's cycles weve known about for some time, that's rudimentary knowledge from 8th grade, and dinosaurs.
                        Are we the problem for the current state of things though?
                        How did scientists from virtually every country on earth start agreeing on this? The most plausible reason vs your argument, is, it had to be to help the Democratic party.
                        It makes no sense. This worldwide thing, backed by almost every country on earth, is hoax. Wow. We can't get 2 countries to agree on anything, but somehow, someone convinced almost every country on this. Talk about conspiracy theory.
                        Fly wise you say I make a good point toward pollution.
                        What is our contribution to GW if it's not pollution.
                        Were are destroying nature faster than it can fix itself, and even in today's age of instant information some refuse to see this.
                        We once had a great Republican, with immenseforesight, thought and vision. His name was Teddy Roosevelt.
                        Think about what if. What if he hadn't done what he did, and today's thought had of pervaded unchecked.
                        No Yellowstone, no Yosemite, on and on and on. None of that existed today, because drill baby drill was the mindset.
                        It could have happened, I'm glad it didn't.
                        Nature is something special, but it's true beauty is being lost by a new mindset, as we pull ever further away from it.
                        Then you look at how we already have a man made chemical in every human on earth, look at the MTS weve torn down, the things we dump in the water, etc. Multiplied by the billions worldwide, yet people believe weve have no impact.
                        It plain and simple, the wrong mindset, when looking into the


                        I could not stand to read.most of your point but yes, most of the world is socialist, most of the world want to bring America down a few notches....at least enough that we agree to send them our money ( my money and yours ). Climate date ( futures) are based on models and humans with an agenda provide the data. Climate change ABSOLUTELY CANNOT be manipulated by humans. It has been changing for a few billion years.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Pedernal View Post
                          I just farted am I going to be exterminated with the cows
                          Depends, is it windy where you are? I farted a few times today but winds are about 40 from the west. So I'm good.

                          Comment


                            Well Im like Ron White... Ill do my part by eating those farting cows.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by flywise View Post
                              Depends, is it windy where you are? I farted a few times today but winds are about 40 from the west. So I'm good.
                              Well it was really windy here too but I was inside but not under blankets thankfully

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Playa View Post
                                The point isn’t whether this is some Dem conspiracy. The point is historical science data proves man isn’t the cause. Spending billions of dollars to slow a natural process is just stupid, unless you are the one receiving the funds... ie the climate scientists who are pushing the agenda
                                If one watches pretty much any show on science and you can't see they are trying to prove a certain point then you're blind. It's been a long long time since I've seen one that is just studying versus straight up admitting they are looking at "X" to prove "Y" which in my mind is not science.

                                [quote=flywise;14011681]
                                Originally posted by MadHatter View Post


                                I could not stand to read.most of your point but yes, most of the world is socialist, most of the world want to bring America down a few notches....at least enough that we agree to send them our money ( my money and yours ). Climate date ( futures) are based on models and humans with an agenda provide the data. Climate change ABSOLUTELY CANNOT be manipulated by humans. It has been changing for a few billion years.
                                The world follows whatever is PC. And yes most times to get money in one way or another. They dare not say women are different than men, it's wrong to be gay, certain races are better/worse than others, or Trump is doing anything good.

                                So just because a bunch of idiots in power want more money doesn't prove anything.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X