No question they would make it right. Glad it’s been sorted out for ya!
Sierracharlie out…
Sierracharlie out…
-
-
-
Originally posted by trophy8 View Post
Right now all I can say is the glass is very clear. Unfortunately there was a problem with the zero stop and I had to send it back for warranty. They have fixed it and are sending it back after the holidays
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
that ATLAS looks darn good brother, long action - What is the barrel chambered in ?
huge fan of KELBLY products
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cajun Blake View Postthat ATLAS looks darn good brother, long action - What is the barrel chambered in ?
huge fan of KELBLY products
You’ll be a big fan of the chambering too. .280ai
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
How’s it compare to the atacr so far? I know your use is limited so far. I have one headed my way. A 4-32x50 F1 MilCOriginally posted by Texas89 View PostComment
-
Originally posted by trophy8 View Post
Not as clear as the atacr however, I’m not sure the atacr is worth the extra $1300 either. It’s very short though.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
I've got both the 4-32 and 2.5-20. I really thought I would prefer the 2.5-20 for what I am using them for, but the 4-32 seems to have slightly better glass(which may just be my samples). It seems to be closer to my ATACRs than the 2.5-20, but neither are quite at that level. Both are a step up from the NXS.Originally posted by trophy8 View Post
What I found interesting is the actual weight difference between the 2 versions is less than 1 oz on our shop scale. The footprint on the 32 is not that much bigger either. I'd say the glass difference between my 2 are about the same as the difference between the 5-25 and 7-35 ATACR. Some folks will see it, some won't. It's small.
I borrowed a 2.5-20 to go on my SD hunt in November since mine wasn't here yet, and did observe some tracking error in that one. I haven't tested mine yet on the tall target. There isn't much room for rings on either
Comment
-
Anxious to get mine. If it’s a winner I’ll sell the atacr and get another one. Just Leary that the atacr is betterOriginally posted by Stick1 View PostI've got both the 4-32 and 2.5-20. I really thought I would prefer the 2.5-20 for what I am using them for, but the 4-32 seems to have slightly better glass(which may just be my samples). It seems to be closer to my ATACRs than the 2.5-20, but neither are quite at that level. Both are a step up from the NXS.
What I found interesting is the actual weight difference between the 2 versions is less than 1 oz on our shop scale. The footprint on the 32 is not that much bigger either. I'd say the glass difference between my 2 are about the same as the difference between the 5-25 and 7-35 ATACR. Some folks will see it, some won't. It's small.
I borrowed a 2.5-20 to go on my SD hunt in November since mine wasn't here yet, and did observe some tracking error in that one. I haven't tested mine yet on the tall target. There isn't much room for rings on eitherComment
-
Just got tracking from Nightforce on Friday. They have completed the repair and the scope if smoking back with Fedex. Didn’t cost me a dime. Good folks over there for sure.Comment
-
Comment