Again, if you agree that the cause of the problem is all the feeding, you're also agreeing that all those deer wouldn't be there absent the feeding.
It's sort of a "have your cake and eat it too" argument. rocky wouldn't have this massive population of deer if they weren't doing that per everyone that's chimed in from nearby areas that don't have tons of deer.
Do you want to have a massive amount of deer that they reduce every few years when it gets out of control or do you want to have no deer because they're not feeding them?
It's sort of a "have your cake and eat it too" argument. rocky wouldn't have this massive population of deer if they weren't doing that per everyone that's chimed in from nearby areas that don't have tons of deer.
Do you want to have a massive amount of deer that they reduce every few years when it gets out of control or do you want to have no deer because they're not feeding them?
Comment