Originally posted by jerp
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Birthright citizenship to be eliminated by EO
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by RiverRat1 View PostDoesn't seem complicated. Someone here illegally is not subject to the jurisdiction. And when Texansfan says they are then he needs to tell us who exactly is NOT subject... Or why was it put in there then? LOL
It was put in there before the internet and before Mexico was even our border nation.
Everybody in the USA is subject to our laws as soon as they touch our soil.
And not only illegal aliens have babies here.
Folks on student visas and even europeans on work visas INTENTIONALLY have kids here so their kids can be Americans.
Comment
-
Originally posted by texansfan View PostIt was put in there before the internet and before Mexico was even our border nation.
Everybody in the USA is subject to our laws as soon as they touch our soil.
And not only illegal aliens have babies here.
Folks on student visas and even europeans on work visas INTENTIONALLY have kids here so their kids can be Americans.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ironman View PostAll the more reason for the SC to interpret the intent of the 14th.
How can you interpret something that was written 200 years ago without current day context?
So you're ok with those liberal justices "interpreting" the constitution?
Because I don't think the intent of the 2nd is what many think it is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by texansfan View PostLoL
How can you interpret something that was written 200 years ago without current day context?
So you're ok with those liberal justices "interpreting" the constitution?
Because I don't think the intent of the 2nd is what many think it is.
Of course you don't...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dale Moser View PostOf course you don't...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If that is the case, these little peashooters we have are of no match for the artillery that the government has so we need to be able to possess all the bombs, grenades and other high tech stuff the government has in order to make the fight fair if it came down to that.
There is no way any militia in this country could fight off the us military if the military didn't care.
They could just bomb us to smithereens
Use those loud ear piercing vehicles to bring us to our knees
Comment
-
I believe Mark Levin is one of the best constitutional lawyers of our time and I put a lot of weight in his thought process and how he views the situation according to the constitution. I am a Trump supporter and I think he is onto something and I bet he gets this done.
Sent from my VS987 using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by texansfan View PostI think the 2nd was put in place with the spirit that an average man should be able to hold weapons in order to fight off the government if need be.
If that is the case, these little peashooters we have are of no match for the artillery that the government has so we need to be able to possess all the bombs, grenades and other high tech stuff the government has in order to make the fight fair if it came down to that.
There is no way any militia in this country could fight off the us military if the military didn't care.
They could just bomb us to smithereens
Use those loud ear piercing vehicles to bring us to our knees
Comment
-
Originally posted by texansfan View PostI think the 2nd was put in place with the spirit that an average man should be able to hold weapons in order to fight off the government if need be.
Now the media gets to SELL us news.
The invaders from the south could stop our well healed military, just using TV cameras
Comment
-
Originally posted by LWC View PostHmmm. Tell that to Afganistan and Vietnam. They seemed to put up a pretty good fight with "peashooters". You can let your buddies have yours. I'll keep mine.
But in both of those wars we went in trying to fight a "pc" war
If the shackles would have been removed and we just went all out no country is a match for us
Im talking scorched earth
If we did that, we would never lose
Comment
-
Originally posted by batmaninja View PostAnd the 1st was put in place when people only had feathers and ink wells.
Now the media gets to SELL us news.
The invaders from the south could stop our well healed military, just using TV cameras
Essentially come in riot gear and detain them all right on the border.
Quickly process them back to their side of the river.
Comment
-
Originally posted by texansfan View PostI think the 2nd was put in place with the spirit that an average man should be able to hold weapons in order to fight off the government if need be.
If that is the case, these little peashooters we have are of no match for the artillery that the government has so we need to be able to possess all the bombs, grenades and other high tech stuff the government has in order to make the fight fair if it came down to that.
There is no way any militia in this country could fight off the us military if the military didn't care.
They could just bomb us to smithereens
Use those loud ear piercing vehicles to bring us to our knees
You assume the government would have the support of the military, which it would not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
Comment