So I was going to upgrade binoculars some time this year and my wife being the awesome one she is surprised me with some Nikon monarch 5 10x42's.
I have been using vortex diamondback 10x42 and I only use them in the deer stand with maximum distance of about 300 yds but was wanting a little better low light performance. I don't know much about binoculars so I was planning on doing a lot of research before I made any purchase, but off the top of my head Nikon was not on my list to look into...
She told me I was welcome to return them if they were not the ones I wanted but she was very proud of herself so I would hate to do that. I had a budget in mind of $500 (did not tell her this) and for what I use them for I think that is really splurging. My question is should I stay with the Nikons at $300 or is there going to be a significant jump in quality from $300-$500 binos?
I have been using vortex diamondback 10x42 and I only use them in the deer stand with maximum distance of about 300 yds but was wanting a little better low light performance. I don't know much about binoculars so I was planning on doing a lot of research before I made any purchase, but off the top of my head Nikon was not on my list to look into...
She told me I was welcome to return them if they were not the ones I wanted but she was very proud of herself so I would hate to do that. I had a budget in mind of $500 (did not tell her this) and for what I use them for I think that is really splurging. My question is should I stay with the Nikons at $300 or is there going to be a significant jump in quality from $300-$500 binos?
Comment