Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Governor Abbott Unveils Texas Plan, Offers Constitutional Amendments To Restore The R

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Governor Abbott Unveils Texas Plan, Offers Constitutional Amendments To Restore The R

    I haven't heard much about this since 1/8



    Governor Greg Abbott today delivered the keynote address at the Texas Public Policy Foundation’s Annual Policy Orientation where he unveiled his Texas Plan to restore the Rule of Law and return the Constitution to its intended purpose. In his plan, Governor Abbott offers nine constitutional amendments to rein in the federal government and restore the balance of power between the States and the United States. The Governor proposes achieving the constitutional amendments through a Convention Of States.

    “The increasingly frequent departures from Constitutional principles are destroying the Rule of Law foundation on which this country was built,” said Governor Abbott. “We are succumbing to the caprice of man that our Founders fought to escape. The cure to these problems will not come from Washington D.C. Instead, the states must lead the way. To do that I am adding another item to the agenda next session. I want legislation authorizing Texas to join other states in calling for a Convention of States to fix the cracks in our Constitution.”

    Governor Abbott went on to explain that dysfunction in Washington, D.C. stems largely from the federal government’s refusal to follow the Constitution. Congress routinely violates its enumerated powers, while taxing and spending its way from one financial crisis to another. The President exceeds his executive powers to impose heavy-handed regulations. And the Supreme Court imposes its policy views under the guise of judicial interpretation. Governor Abbott urged action by Texas – and other states – to restore the Rule of Law in America.

    Governor Abbott offered the following constitutional amendments:

    Prohibit Congress from regulating activity that occurs wholly within one State.
    Require Congress to balance its budget.
    Prohibit administrative agencies—and the unelected bureaucrats that staff them—from creating federal law.
    Prohibit administrative agencies—and the unelected bureaucrats that staff them—from preempting state law.
    Allow a two-thirds majority of the States to override a U.S. Supreme Court decision.
    Require a seven-justice super-majority vote for U.S. Supreme Court decisions that invalidate a democratically enacted law.
    Restore the balance of power between the federal and state governments by limiting the former to the powers expressly delegated to it in the Constitution.
    Give state officials the power to sue in federal court when federal officials overstep their bounds.
    Allow a two-thirds majority of the States to override a federal law or regulation.
    To view Governor Abbott's full plan, click here.

    #2
    Sounds good but probably pizzing in the wind, sadly. Hey, @ least he's trying!

    Comment


      #3
      I'll support it. I wonder how many or if any other states will propose similar plans.

      Comment


        #4
        Good on you, Governor, but I don't see it happening. As I said in another thread, the threshold for constitutional amendments is too high. I don't see 2/3 or 3/4 of the state legislatures agreeing to this kind of thing.

        I hope it turns out that this is a strategic move, set up in order that it would be denied. Then Texas can legitimately say, "we asked you to fix it, and you didn't, so now we're going to do our own thing." I hope this is an opening move in the game toward Texas independence, much like several other moves, such as the recent change allowing fireworks on Texas Independence day, having the school kids say the Texas pledge, and authorizing the Texas gold depository. All preliminary steps toward an end, I hope.

        Comment


          #5
          Win/Win

          Originally posted by Jason Fry View Post
          Good on you, Governor, but I don't see it happening. As I said in another thread, the threshold for constitutional amendments is too high. I don't see 2/3 or 3/4 of the state legislatures agreeing to this kind of thing.
          If Trump wins the presidency and we try this afterwards, I can see it going through (as all of the blue states would love nothing more than to disregard him). That would be great since it would revitalize states' rights which needs to happen regardless of who's in office.

          Comment


            #6
            The Liberty Amendments by Mark Levin would be worth reading. I listen to his free podcast.

            Comment


              #7
              If you want to actually do something to blow up the political establishment, then get involved in this effort. Government is out of control. They don't even hide the fact that they ignore the Constitution and all of our laws anymore. The only way to reign them in is for citizens at the grass roots level to take the initiative to get it done. Gov. Abbott's plan would do a LOT of good toward that end. There are other good ideas about an Article V convention as well. It just needs grass root support and involvement to happen. It will be a long process even if it is successful, but it will never happen if we do nothing.

              Go here for info on what is being done across the nation:

              Article V offers the only constitutional solution as big as the problem. Together, we can end federal overreach.



              And at the state level here in Texas:




              And at the local level within Texas:



              I am going to be out of town on the day of the next meeting here in Abilene, but I plan to attend the August meeting.

              Comment


                #8
                Interesting amendments on the judiciary, it would basically take away all the SC's power.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by sir shovelhands View Post
                  Interesting amendments on the judiciary, it would basically take away all the SC's power.
                  I wouldn't say it takes away their power, but it definitely limits them to make rulings based on law, and not political affiliations. I would think that a majority could be had if the SC makes a ruling that is obviously political. But also limiting them to only national rulings and not giving them power over state rulings will be a plus.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I think they are all great ideas and I really like it that Gov Abbott is doing something, at least trying. But I am not a big fan of a convention of states. Once they convene there is no telling what they will change.

                    Besides, it seems like our Gov is trying to write rules in the book that few in Washington DC care about anyway. The new rule says you have to follow the old rules that were being ignored.

                    Good luck with that.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Gov Abbott should add number 10, 11 and 12.

                      10. Congress shall pass no law affecting the People that does not equally apply to members of Congress and federal government employees, and no law affecting the Congress and federal government employees that does not equally apply to the people.

                      11. Clarify that citizenship is granted to children born in the US are "subject to the jurisdiction" means somebody in the country illegally or on a tourist visa are not citizens.

                      12. The individual states shall have the power to enforce and adjudicate federal laws if the federal government does not.


                      ..... the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X