Originally posted by systemnt
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
trump, kim jong meeting?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Man View PostYou think we can get someone to tape a .38 behind the toilet for Trump?
Comment
-
Originally posted by sir shovelhands View PostAnd they have a history of NEVER honoring their agreements regarding nuclear weapons.
If anyone's interested, here's the list of all the times NK hasn't complied with agreements for the past 33 years: https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/dprkchron
And now all of a sudden they're game to give them up? Forgive me for being skeptical.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GarGuy View PostI dont think they plan to just give them up.. I do think a man to man meeting might just clear his eyes a little. i think the fact that trump said he would destroy the little guy and then started rolling the weaponry and ships in got the little guy thinking trump meant it. i have had a couple off man to man meetings with jackwagon bullies on the past that absolutely corrected their behavior because they saw i was 6ft4 260lbs and darn sure meant it.
He did.
Bullet in the ear.
Comment
-
Originally posted by systemnt View PostDid you grow up worshipped and told you were a God, and have no concept of the idea of what its like to be told no or what to do?
He did.
Bullet in the ear.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Man View PostSomewhat skeptical as well....but would be curious to know in the past 33 years if they have ever been in this much of an economic situation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Man View Postsystemnt....say it isn't so we finally disagree on something. All you mentioned is true, but the talks are very important. It is a positive step forward in disarming a crazy man that has the potential to kill hundreds of thousands of people with the weapons he is sitting on right now.Originally posted by systemnt View PostA bullet to the forehead does that too.
Originally posted by sir shovelhands View PostAnd they have a history of NEVER honoring their agreements regarding nuclear weapons.
If anyone's interested, here's the list of all the times NK hasn't complied with agreements for the past 33 years: https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/dprkchron
And now all of a sudden they're game to give them up? Forgive me for being skeptical.Originally posted by Man View PostSomewhat skeptical as well....but would be curious to know in the past 33 years if they have ever been in this much of an economic situation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by systemnt View PostI'm not fully understanding why people think talking with little kim is a good positive thing.
He is a dictator. His people live in fear and famine. He assassinates his own kin. He executes his citizens and relatives like its a drinking game.
His family has literally indoctrinated the last 3 generations of his country that America is evil and must be destroyed.
He's made threat after threat towards america, its president, its allies, and test fired missiles and nuclear weapons.
What words could ever possibly be exchanged with him that would make any difference whatsoever?
Human rights organizations should be screaming from the roof tops to have him and his regime wiped out for the sake of the people there. Not praising peace talks.
Hes a criminal, a murderer, a genocide-ist, and a profiter from his own peoples misery.
I dont get it.
Originally posted by systemnt View PostA bullet to the forehead does that too.
Originally posted by Man View PostYou think we can get someone to tape a .38 behind the toilet for Trump?
Comment
-
Originally posted by GarGuy View PostLOL! I generally agree with your stance here. i just dont think that would resolve the mess even though it might be a start. Im thinking Trump tells him change or die... then backs it up either way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RiverRat1 View PostHe won't just give them stuff up front so when they break the agreement they keep the stuff.
Back in the 90s, Clinton got an invite to Korea, but sent his Secretary of State instead. That trip, while embarrassing because it came to nothing and sent a message that the US would meet with murderous psychotic dictators, would have been much worse had the sitting US President gone.
If I were Trump, I'd have my underlings negotiate all the details of a full and enforceable agreement with NK before even considering meeting with Kim And then preferably have the meeting in China to sign any agreement, so they wouldn't have to deal with the optics of the same NK pageantry they had when Albright was there.
Replace this picture with Trump and Lil Kim, and tell me how that plays out in the next election if NK continues their nuke program afterwards.
Comment
Comment