So I'm working up loads for my 6.5MB RAP (in an MDT chassis). I finally got a hold of 8 pounds of H4350. Federal Gold Medal primers. Brass is 2x fired Hornady which has been trimmed to 1.910", primer pockets uniformed, flash holes deburred in and out. Neck sized only, with 0.002" tension using a Lee sizing die.
Shot 5 loads from 42.4 to 43.2 grains, all measured and trickled up to weight. I had previously seen this as a "flat" spot in the velocity curve when I had done pressure checks in half grain increments. I didn't see any pressure signs whatsoever at 43.5 grains, which is where I stopped.
My SD is worse than a Hillary presidency. The best I got with those loads was a measly 18.2, the worst was 33. Velocity was measured with a cheap Shooting Chrony. I was shooting at 300 yards. Wind was negligible until about halfway through, then it started gusting from 4 oclock up to about 6 mph. I wasn't as worried about overall group size as I was the vertical grouping. Bipod on the front and a heavy sock bag in the back.
Charge 42.4 42.6 42.8 43 43.2
Average 2774 2752.4 2798.2 2787.6 2789.8
Std Dev 22.2 25.3 18.2 33.0 22.7
Overall grp 4 2 5 5.75 5.5
Vertical grp 2.75 2 2.25 1 4.25
So which do I believe, the raw data or the groups on the paper?
Shot 5 loads from 42.4 to 43.2 grains, all measured and trickled up to weight. I had previously seen this as a "flat" spot in the velocity curve when I had done pressure checks in half grain increments. I didn't see any pressure signs whatsoever at 43.5 grains, which is where I stopped.
My SD is worse than a Hillary presidency. The best I got with those loads was a measly 18.2, the worst was 33. Velocity was measured with a cheap Shooting Chrony. I was shooting at 300 yards. Wind was negligible until about halfway through, then it started gusting from 4 oclock up to about 6 mph. I wasn't as worried about overall group size as I was the vertical grouping. Bipod on the front and a heavy sock bag in the back.
Charge 42.4 42.6 42.8 43 43.2
Average 2774 2752.4 2798.2 2787.6 2789.8
Std Dev 22.2 25.3 18.2 33.0 22.7
Overall grp 4 2 5 5.75 5.5
Vertical grp 2.75 2 2.25 1 4.25
So which do I believe, the raw data or the groups on the paper?
Comment