Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Woohoo

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Woohoo

    Its a coming ladies and gents. Get ready for more freedom!


    #2
    Popcorn ready!

    Comment


      #3
      Come on! Who doesn't love em some freedom? 'Merica!

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Ironman View Post
        Popcorn ready!
        I think Cheetos or Funyuns would be more appropriate

        Comment


          #5
          I'm not a Kim Ogg fan, but this is a good move. I noticed that the articles said the Texas AG office hasn't commented. I'd hope they follow suit on this. We have bigger fish to fry than worrying about what people use to get high.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Playa View Post
            I think Cheetos or Funyuns would be more appropriate
            Yes! Wait! What were we talking about?

            Comment


              #7
              Actually a good move on the democrats part. This is an issue I will jump to the other side to support. Next step is just to legalize and be done. To think anyone would really take it serious on enforcement after this rolls out is comical.

              Comment


                #8
                This was posted about this time last year. Notice the article is from Feb. of 2017.
                I don’t see much of this coming fruition.


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Man View Post
                  Actually a good move on the democrats part. This is an issue I will jump to the other side to support. Next step is just to legalize and be done. To think anyone would really take it serious on enforcement after this rolls out is comical.
                  So you would trade guns for pot?

                  I'm somewhat ambivalent on this one. I see the tide shifting in favor with or without having to vote for the democrats. On the other hand, there is only one side always trying to take guns away.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by bloodstick View Post
                    This was posted about this time last year. Notice the article is from Feb. of 2017.
                    I don’t see much of this coming fruition.


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


                    It is old. ****. But they did it.


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Rush2Judge View Post
                      So you would trade guns for pot?
                      I would not trade guns for pot.

                      I'm not sure the steps taken would have been the same if she had chosen to incarcerate someone harder for having a smaller amount of pot. As is I am not sure her actions taken would work in that scenario you presented?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X