Originally posted by RJH1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lindsey Graham backs Gun Confiscation Law
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by flywise View PostNO, I proved that gov. has been infringing on my rights since before i was born,only, unlike a red flag law i have no recourse.
Go get your tin foil hat
Comment
-
Originally posted by RJH1 View PostOther than you have to prove your innocence in the case of the red flag laws, instead of the govt proving guilt, which is how it is supposed to work. And a CHL is the recourse in you earlier statement
( chl being the permission I referred to earlier)
Red flag laws are not an open invitation for law to take your guns. They give ( with permission from a judge upon providing evidence from law enforcement) to remove them until it can be taken to court.
Tin foil hats will say all I have to do is call pd and say your a nut and poof weapons gone. That's stupidity and does not happen.
But it dont matter to me, yall can believe what you want .
Comment
-
Originally posted by flywise View PostI dont want a CHL and according to the 2nd amendment I should not have to get a chl
( chl being the permission I referred to earlier)
[Agree with your point, but the CHL is the recourse
Red flag laws are not an open invitation for law to take your guns. They give ( with permission from a judge upon providing evidence from law enforcement) to remove them until it can be taken to court.
Tin foil hats will say all I have to do is call pd and say your a nut and poof weapons gone. That's stupidity and does not happen.
But it dont matter to me, yall can believe what you want .
Actually has happened and a man was shot and killed when the police showed up to take his guns that a family member said he shouldn't have.
Also, since when is showing a judge some info considered proven in a court of law, hell that even a grand jury.
Comment
-
Originally posted by flywise View PostI dont want a CHL and according to the 2nd amendment I should not have to get a chl
( chl being the permission I referred to earlier)
Red flag laws are not an open invitation for law to take your guns. They give ( with permission from a judge upon providing evidence from law enforcement) to remove them until it can be taken to court.
Tin foil hats will say all I have to do is call pd and say your a nut and poof weapons gone. That's stupidity and does not happen.
But it dont matter to me, yall can believe what you want .
Comment
-
Originally posted by flywise View PostI dont want a CHL and according to the 2nd amendment I should not have to get a chl
( chl being the permission I referred to earlier)
Red flag laws are not an open invitation for law to take your guns. They give ( with permission from a judge upon providing evidence from law enforcement) to remove them until it can be taken to court.
Tin foil hats will say all I have to do is call pd and say your a nut and poof weapons gone. That's stupidity and does not happen.
But it dont matter to me, yall can believe what you want .
All worked out for me in the end, but it could have been terrible
Comment
-
How many of you have years of experience dealing with psychotic people on a weekly basis?
How many of you have had to tackle a man going for a gun on the night stand next to his bed?
Could it be that your opinions stem from never or very rarely having to deal with the individuals that these laws are meant to deal with?
Comment
-
Originally posted by flywise View PostHow many of you have years of experience dealing with psychotic people on a weekly basis?
How many of you have had to tackle a man going for a gun on the night stand next to his bed?
Could it be that your opinions stem from never or very rarely having to deal with the individuals that these laws are meant to deal with?
Comment
-
Originally posted by AndrewIBEW View PostExcept the majority of the time its law abiding citizens that are affected. Criminals will never follow the law anyways. Red flag laws wont stop a psychotic person from getting a gun, and youll still be going in to their house to take their gun.
Comment
-
Originally posted by flywise View PostHas nothing to do with criminals
Comment
-
Originally posted by flywise View PostHow many of you have years of experience dealing with psychotic people on a weekly basis?
How many of you have had to tackle a man going for a gun on the night stand next to his bed?
Could it be that your opinions stem from never or very rarely having to deal with the individuals that these laws are meant to deal with?
Laws only affect law abiding citizens, and until someone does something illegal, they are a law abiding citizen. That is part of the danger of a free society and a danger that many, myself included are willing to risk.
Could it be, that dealing with criminals everyday has jaded your viewpoint to the point that you see everyone as a criminal until they prove to you that they are not? Even to the point of stripping them of a Constitutional right, until they can prove the negative, that they have broken no laws (hmm, seems impossible right). And all for a false sense of security, sounds like some good old liberal logic.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by RJH1 View PostNo law has ever stopped a criminal from a criminal act, perpetrators gonna perpetrate, yo.
Laws only affect law abiding citizens, and until someone does something illegal, they are a law abiding citizen. That is part of the danger of a free society and a danger that many, myself included are willing to risk.
Could it be, that dealing with criminals everyday has jaded your viewpoint to the point that you see everyone as a criminal until they prove to you that they are not? Even to the point of stripping them of a Constitutional right, until they can prove the negative, that they have broken no laws (hmm, seems impossible right). And all for a false sense of security, sounds like some good old liberal logic.....
Comment
Comment