Originally posted by curtintex
View Post
The article that I read was a little confusing because at first it made it sound like the game warden was calling him a habitual poacher, when it wasn't that at all. I'm not defending him, but there is no proof that he's done anything else wrong, and if you assume that, you're probably one that starts that type of rumor.
I still think he's a good guy that made a bad decision, and now he's paying for it.
It's a shame that there's a guy that's written a book about his poaching exploits, and is making money off of it without even a slap on the hand.
Comment