For those that use a Paragon oven for heat treat, what program settings are you using to heat treat ats-34? Ramp rate is what I'm most interested in.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Knife makers
Collapse
X
-
Agree with Mike. Ramp rate isn't critical, IMO. I typically start cold and stage mine at 1500-1600 for a few minutes to equalize, then on up to 1950 for CM154/Ats-34. Plate quench, then dry ice/kerosene immediately. Temper after that, typically from 450 to 550, depending on the hardness test results. I have found some inconsistency between bars or batches, so that I can't just say "temper at *** for RC 59."
Comment
-
Originally posted by MikeConner View PostI don't think it's absolutely necessary but it certainly doesn't hurt. Most gain I've seen is a 1 point difference. A lot of guys are using dry ice and RV antifreeze these days to eliminate the toxic fumes and fire danger associated with kerosene or acetone.
I agree 100% will all Mike said; the RV antifreeze is sure safer!
Comment
-
OK, my first test piece came out really low. Here's my recipe, so please tell me what I need to change to get the hardness up. It came out at about 51, way too low. 1/8" ATS-34
Start cold oven and ramp full to 1450, hold for 10 minutes.
Ramp full to 1950, soak for 15 minutes (I think this is where I messed up. Should be about 45 minutes)
Remove and plate quench to below 125.
Immediately, place in oven and soak at 450 for 2 hours.
Shut off oven and let it cool to room temp.
Start oven and soak at 450 for another 2 hours.
Open to suggestions about what to modify to get 59-60, at 51 now.
Comment
-
I agree from the research that I've done, it should have came in at least closer to 59-60 than it did. Now, the testing was done with a portable "rebound tester" that a friend (mechanical engineer) borrowed from his office. I'm not 100% confident in the test as the rebound testers specs say it isn't suitable for thin parts like knife blades, but he insists that it is accurate within 0.5 harness. I don't have access to any files or any other hardness tester. I know for sure the test piece was ATS-34 (at least that what I ordered and it was marked when I received it). It was foil wrapped during the high heat cycle and plate quench. I would like to get it tested by a more accurate tester, but lack of access is preventing that at the moment.
Comment
Comment