He's toast now that the word is out that he is for amnesty. NAFTA and the Pacific trade agreement..
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Kasich vows amnesty in 1st 100 days
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Mike D View PostHave you been paying attention? He would have to have 112% of the remaining delegates to win. Unless I just don't understand math that don't work.
Now if the establishment forces him in via a brokered convention, there will be a ****storm like no other seen in a while. The American people have no stomach for that. The best thing that Trump can do is keep the Republican electorate fired up whether or not he gets the nomination. It's still a long time to the election and folks tend to have short memories.
Here's the way it works:
Kasich wins Ohio, and Trump underperforms in most remaining states, indicating second thoughts by the voting public.
At Convention, it goes to 3rd or 4th ballot, with Cruz not yielding, and Rubio's delegates refusing to help him out. (In 1880 it went to 36 ballots before James Garfield won the nomination.)
Most delegates won't want to see a candidate vs. Hillary that has no chance (Trump). Most will ultimately acknowledge that Cruz has burned too many bridges, and they need someone else. Maybe that someone is Paul Ryan, but my money at that point would be on Kasich.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AJ the TP Guru View PostYes, I have been paying attention. Hey, I'm retired with nothing better to do (other than help bowhunters extricate their target panic) than to watch Fox, CNN, & MSNBC (but only for laughs). My opening tabs are Fox News, Real Clear Politics, Politico, Drudge Report, and Breitbart.
Here's the way it works:
Kasich wins Ohio, and Trump underperforms in most remaining states, indicating second thoughts by the voting public.
At Convention, it goes to 3rd or 4th ballot, with Cruz not yielding, and Rubio's delegates refusing to help him out. (In 1880 it went to 36 ballots before James Garfield won the nomination.)
Most delegates won't want to see a candidate vs. Hillary that has no chance (Trump). Most will ultimately acknowledge that Cruz has burned too many bridges, and they need someone else. Maybe that someone is Paul Ryan, but my money at that point would be on Kasich.
I disagree. Only way Kasich sees the nomination is a brokered convention. And I'm willing to bet we have Hillary if that happens.
Comment
-
Not at all surprising.
As new reports break that a George Soros-linked group is taking credit for efforts to violently disrupt GOP frontrunner Donald Trump's campaign rallies, the Center for Responsive Politics reveals that another George Soros-linked group is coordinating another furtive operation to stop Trump by financing the campaign of John Kasich. |
As new reports break that a George Soros-linked group is taking credit for efforts to violently disrupt GOP frontrunner Donald Trump’s campaign rallies, the Center for Responsive Politics reveals that another George Soros-linked group is coordinating another furtive operation to stop Trump by financing the campaign of John Kasich.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jfisher View Postbut let an american citizen miss an entry on an irs form, or even forget to pay...(al sharpton not included)
funny when it comes to "rounding up" those folks, or "tearing apart a family" because the tax cheat has to go to prison from breaking the law, is never used as a reason to not prosecute.
Hell, how many family's have been "torn apart" from jailed bank robbers, illegal gambling, and minor drug possession?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike Javi Cooper View PostShould make you wonder what it is that scares both sides so badly.
Sadly, there's no way to know who's right about the man, due to all his inconsistencies. That, in an of itself, is scary enough. He might do what we'd like today, but then tomorrow he might decide to go back 180 degrees in the other direction again if he decides he could benefit from another flip. No core principles makes for a VERY unpredictable and untrustworthy fella.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shane View PostThe libs are afraid Trump has changed and is now telling the truth about how he'd govern. The conservatives are afraid he hasn't changed at all and he's lying about how he'd govern.
Sadly, there's no way to know who's right about the man, due to all his inconsistencies. That, in an of itself, is scary enough. He might do what we'd like today, but then tomorrow he might decide to go back 180 degrees in the other direction again if he decides he could benefit from another flip. No core principles makes for a VERY unpredictable and untrustworthy fella.
I'm willing to take a chance on something different. Tired of the insanity.Last edited by PondPopper; 03-14-2016, 03:01 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike Javi Cooper View PostShould make you wonder what it is that scares both sides so badly.
It is mind numbing to watch how the media - which is owned by Fortune 50 companies - is abandoning all journalistic standards and integrity in the name of derailing Donald Trump. And I just don't believe it is out of the goodness of their pea picking hearts.
Comment
Comment