Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Post Modernist Strategies

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Post Modernist Strategies

    Spitballing here and I am talking about those looking to dominate through power not the poor misguided fools that do not know any better that Marxism and the great Eutopia do not work/exist.

    For the post modernist is intersectionality and identity politics just their way of trying on many different "cloaks" of identity to find the one that evolves into pure immunity from disagreement? They seem to jump from group to group but at the heart of those giving fodder to intersectional group's (Media Matters/BLM/Antifa to name a few) Marxism/Post Modernism rule in absolute terms seems to be the end game. So they search for the most "oppressed group" they can create and use that as the vehicle to launch Marxism; under its cloak of immunity.

    Look at the immunity given to different groups of popular identity politics.
    Rape gangs in Europe. Machete and knife attacks in the UK. The trampling of the 1st amn rights of the CO baker. The Parkland shooter. Everything happening in Venezuela right now. Female genital mutilation in CA and the US.

    At the heart of Marxism is the need for immunity from what would normally be contrarian to societal norms or social mores as Marxism is just that. Contrarian to modern society.

    #2
    Post Modernist Strategies

    Marxism might appear to be a benevolent ideology, put the good of the society above the good of the individual, except that human nature won’t leave it at the macro level. “He’s richer than me so I should get some of his stuff to make us all equal”, which is followed by the same demands of poorer and poorer individuals until the society is, by demand of the individual, stripped of value and work ethic.

    Identity politics and victimism are the same. These people have realized, either consciously or subconsciously, that they cannot compete effectively in society. Whether economically, the ability to attract a mate, or any other element of human nature that thrives through competition, they have observed that they don’t have whatever it is that drives a society forward. Instead of seeking to develop a perceived shortcoming into something that enables them to compete, the mentality is to instead rewrite the rules to shift the definition of “fair” in their favor. As with Marxism where the poorer the individual the stronger the demand for wealth redistribution, these people try to out-victimize each other in hopes that their demands of fairness are more valid. Being black was passed by up by being gay. Another attempt at feminism brought them all three wide through the turn, but then being trans passed everyone going down the straightaway. People too insecure to openly join the race instead added the Q for “questioning” on the the LGBT race team. Free agency took over and now you have people who are black gay women that are transitioning to men who but who identify as a straight Latino woman, which makes the transitioned “man” physically gay but not mentally gay, but still a gay black woman, and for **** sure not Latino.

    Boom goes the dynamite. It is a cultural war, but not one that is sustainable. The victimist mentality is one that fractures groups further and further, not one that provides cohesiveness. They will destroy themselves, and thanks to Brave New World and the Pareto Distribution, we alphas will always figure out how to game the system and exploit whatever rules are in place to make sure we are always in the 10%.
    Last edited by txpitdog; 06-08-2018, 11:22 AM.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by txpitdog View Post
      Marxism might appear to be a benevolent ideology, put the good of the society above the good of the individual, except that human nature won’t leave it at the macro level. “He’s richer than me so I should get some of his stuff to make us all equal”, which is followed by the same demands of poorer and poorer individuals until the society is, by demand of the individual, stripped of value and work ethic.

      Identity politics and victimism are the same. These people have realized, either consciously or subconsciously, that they cannot compete effectively in society. Whether economically, the ability to attract a mate, or any other element of human nature that thrives through competition, they have observed that they don’t have whatever it is that drives a society forward. Instead of seeking to develop a perceived shortcoming into something that enables them to compete, the mentality is to instead rewrite the rules to shift the definition of “fair” in their favor. As with Marxism where the poorer the individual the stronger the demand for wealth redistribution, these people try to out-victimize each other in hopes that their demands of fairness are more valid. Being black was passed by up by being gay. Another attempt at feminism brought them all three wide through the turn, but then being trans passed everyone going down the straightaway. People too insecure to openly join the race instead added the Q for “questioning” on the the LGBT race team. Free agency took over and now you have people who are black gay women that are transitioning to men who but who identify as a straight Latino woman, which makes the transitioned “man” physically gay but not mentally gay, but still a gay black woman, and for **** sure not Latino.

      Boom goes the dynamite. It is a cultural war, but not one that is sustainable. The victimist mentality is one that fractures groups further and further, not one that provides cohesiveness. They will destroy themselves, and thanks to Brave New World and the Pareto Distribution, we alphas will always figure out how to game the system and exploit whatever rules are in place to make sure we are always in the 10%.
      As well as the Sigmas which are an ever increasing group. Actually a rising population of sigma males and females may be accounting for a good part of the IDW movement. I have read quite a few article recently on the rise of the sigma male that are pretty interesting. Ill see if I can find some but the correlation would be that the sigma despises the "game" so much and the playing of it that virtually no rewards system in politics (power) would entice a sigma to even "play" along with the game just for its rewards even if they thought it was a joke to begin with. So you have someone who is already by definition "born" sick of politics in a time where politics is at its most despised levels ever. A recipe for a newer more enlightened system to take over IMO.
      Last edited by Ætheling; 06-08-2018, 11:54 AM.

      Comment


        #4


        Last edited by Ætheling; 06-08-2018, 11:53 AM.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by J Sweet View Post
          As well as the Sigmas which are an ever increasing group. Actually a rising population of sigma males and females may be accounting for a good part of the IDW movement. I have read quite a few article recently on the rise of the sigma male that are pretty interesting. Ill see if I can find some but the correlation would be that the sigma despises the "game" so much and the playing of it that virtually no rewards system in politics (power) would entice a sigma to even "play" along with the game just for its rewards even if they thought it was a joke to begin with. So you have someone who is already by definition "born" sick of politics in a time where politics is at its most despised levels ever. A recipe for a newer more enlightened system to take over IMO.

          Knowledge of the game enables you to make the choice to play it or not. The game no longer seems like the only reality but instead an artificial environment where the rules do not define success or survival but instead identify the gaps where you can retain your sanity or even move ahead without actually navigating the rules themselves.

          Alphas seek to make the rules and to be the best at playing them. Sigmas either avoid the rules or if they engage them, play the game much differently.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by txpitdog View Post
            Knowledge of the game enables you to make the choice to play it or not. The game no longer seems like the only reality but instead an artificial environment where the rules do not define success or survival but instead identify the gaps where you can retain your sanity or even move ahead without actually navigating the rules themselves.

            Alphas seek to make the rules and to be the best at playing them. Sigmas either avoid the rules or if they engage them, play the game much differently.


            We should ingest the DMT and ponder on these subjects. Answer the meaning to life and then forget what it was haha.


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

            Comment

            Working...
            X