Reply
Go Back   TexasBowhunter.com Community Discussion Forums > Topics > Public Hunting Opportunities
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-19-2018, 09:44 AM   #1
BuckSmasher
Ten Point
 
BuckSmasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tyler, TX
Hunt In: All Over
Default Regular National Forest vs WMA Type II Areas

Have any of y'all noticed much of a difference between the Type II areas and regular National Forest in Sabine, Angelina, and Davy Crockett National forests?

- More hunters in one or the other?
- More game animals in one or the other?
- Better Habitat management in one or the other?


Etc. I am curious to hear your thoughts!
BuckSmasher is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 11-19-2018, 09:47 AM   #2
bowfishtank401
Nubbin' Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Default

I think it's more on how the hunters that that hunt each area and the region some regions have more game than others and some hunters are just hunter and not worried about conservation of course I'm sure there's different game bag limits depending on the property

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
bowfishtank401 is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 11-20-2018, 11:39 AM   #3
BuckSmasher
Ten Point
 
BuckSmasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tyler, TX
Hunt In: All Over
Default

Nobody has an opinion?
BuckSmasher is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 11-20-2018, 11:50 AM   #4
clayree
Six Point
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Default

I have not noticed a difference. Where the difference lies is how deep into the forest one goes. When I hike in for a full 30 minutes where I do not see another hunter, I usually take a deer.

My point is to out work the other hunters. Go where the lazy have no intention of going, and your success factor goes up.
clayree is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 11-20-2018, 12:22 PM   #5
BuckSmasher
Ten Point
 
BuckSmasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tyler, TX
Hunt In: All Over
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clayree View Post
I have not noticed a difference. Where the difference lies is how deep into the forest one goes. When I hike in for a full 30 minutes where I do not see another hunter, I usually take a deer.

My point is to out work the other hunters. Go where the lazy have no intention of going, and your success factor goes up.
It seems to me that the Type II areas have more closed roads and harder to get to areas than the regular forest. Have you noticed that?

I used to hunt the SHNF when I lived in The Woodlands. Now that I live in Tyler I can hunt any of the other three within an hour to an hour and a half from my house.

As I am learning them, I am trying to see if the Type II areas are anything special. Does the $40 extra for the APH permit scare off a lot of pressure?
BuckSmasher is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 11-20-2018, 05:29 PM   #6
clayree
Six Point
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Default

I have hunted Type II and did not really notice it being any better. I had just as much, if not better luck, hunting the Crockett. Again, this is just my opinion....................
clayree is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 11-26-2018, 10:05 PM   #7
tiberiuswade
Four Point
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Default

I hunt both areas and have noticed that there are few hunters on type II lands, as some don't want to pay that $48 fee and restrictions. Their old mindset is they shouldn't have to pay for something that use to be free. There very good areas on wma II lands. I use mountain bike to get back in areas where the lazy ones don't want to go. I even have my game cam still running without worrying of it being taken ( heck if they find it they can have it). Think overall few hunters out on wma II lands

Sent from my SM-T280 using Tapatalk
tiberiuswade is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 11-26-2018, 10:23 PM   #8
Sleepy
Pope & Young
 
Sleepy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tyler, TX
Hunt In: Camp County, Rusk County, Smith County, Kansas
Default

Interested in learning
Sleepy is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 11-28-2018, 02:45 PM   #9
BuckSmasher
Ten Point
 
BuckSmasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tyler, TX
Hunt In: All Over
Default

Interesting perspectives...

The SHNF was all type II and very crowded. I am glad I am closer to other areas now.
BuckSmasher is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 12-04-2018, 04:10 AM   #10
Bowyer
Ten Point
 
Bowyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Barry Tx.
Hunt In: Texas & Oklahoma
Default

I didn't know that there were any National Forest left in Texas that aren't covered under Texas Annual public hunting permit except for Corp of Engineer land.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Bowyer is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 12-06-2018, 01:18 PM   #11
BuckSmasher
Ten Point
 
BuckSmasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tyler, TX
Hunt In: All Over
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowyer View Post
I didn't know that there were any National Forest left in Texas that aren't covered under Texas Annual public hunting permit except for Corp of Engineer land.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Only the SHNF is entirely Type II. The other three have Type II areas but are primarily open to public hunting with just a hunting license and hunter orange.
BuckSmasher is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1999-2012, TexasBowhunter.com