Since generally people agree that, like open carry, this will result in very little if not zero change in people's behavior, it is an ideological argument... some call that mental masturbation.
I'd rather see resources used to preserve existing 2A rights vis a vis "assault weapons," which is actually under legitimate threat in my opinion.
Anyone who says this is, "a major legislative priority for the Republican Party" is out to lunch.
I'd rather see resources used to preserve existing 2A rights vis a vis "assault weapons," which is actually under legitimate threat in my opinion.
Anyone who says this is, "a major legislative priority for the Republican Party" is out to lunch.
Comment