Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Confiscation starts..

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    Originally posted by J Sweet View Post
    90 years is temporary, just saying.
    Yep, the citizens in NO who had their weapons confiscated during Katrina got them back years later, mostly rusted or damaged. A few never got them back. Despite having committed no crime whatsoever.

    Comment


      #47
      Originally posted by Shane View Post
      I think flywise was asking what you/we thought the law/due process should be, not necessarily what it currently is.
      I don't see what's wrong with the current due process. The Florida kid could've and should've been arrested on several occasions.

      Comment


        #48
        Does this new law require the state to return the firearms within a certain amount of time if they cannot prove a person's mental illness?

        Comment


          #49
          Originally posted by flywise View Post
          He is a good idea
          Everyone, including felons and mentally disturbed who are legal American citizens should be allowed to constitution carry at all times and places.
          No gun restrictions on anyone for Any reason
          then other end of that extreme is
          No crazy people are allowed to have guns.
          You must be crazy if you want to own a gun

          Comment


            #50
            Originally posted by donpablo View Post
            Does this new law require the state to return the firearms within a certain amount of time if they cannot prove a person's mental illness?
            Yes, as soon as possible

            Comment


              #51
              Originally posted by flywise View Post
              Yes, as soon as possible
              At the speed of government.....

              Comment


                #52
                Originally posted by Smell the Glove View Post
                If we don't trust the govt to get this right I don't see why we trust the govt to make sure the death penalty is done right.
                Death penalty is decided by a jury of your peers. Not the government. The government just carries out the punishment passed by the jury. At that point, who cares if a death sentence is botched, just juice them up again, they gonna die and who cares if they suffer? The person being executed didn't care when they committed the crime that got them there. Did they?

                Comment


                  #53
                  Originally posted by texansfan View Post
                  #fakenews

                  You need to show your work on this one

                  Please show us where in the DSM it says this
                  DSM-5, it is referencing eating disorders, but obesity can be from an ED

                  Comment


                    #54
                    Originally posted by Playa View Post
                    DSM-5, it is referencing eating disorders, but obesity can be from an ED

                    https://www.healio.com/psychiatry/jo...y-in-emdsm-5em
                    LoL
                    That would be bulimia and anorexia

                    You're conflating two medical conditions.
                    Vince Wilfork is obese but he doesn't have a certifiable "eating disorder"


                    LoL
                    Did you even READ what you linked???
                    I'm sure you just googled and posted because if you'd have read it, the conclusion clearly states....

                    Conclusion
                    In summary, the Eating Disorders Work Group concluded that obesity should not be included in DSM-5. Obesity is a heterogeneous condition with a complex and incompletely understood etiology, and thus cannot be considered a mental disorder per se. There may be obesity phenotypes that are caused by mental disorder, but research focusing on the role of neural mechanisms in the onset and maintenance of obesity and obesity-related behaviors (eg, overeating) is in its infancy.
                    Last edited by texansfan; 03-21-2018, 04:25 AM.

                    Comment


                      #55
                      The main issue with the gun buying process today is they do not prosecute prohibited persons who attempt to buy firearms. If you are a prohibited person, you know it. That is one of the main arguments against more prohibitive laws. About 5 years of prosecutions of prohibited persons, and the majority of them would stop trying to get guns that way. Close that avenue, enforce laws on the books before adding new laws.

                      No one should have their guns confiscated until they are ruled mentally unstable. It should be a panel of multiple doctors, of multiple disciplines. If cleared, you go home to your guns. If not, then you lose your firearms. DUE PROCESS. No elected official should be involved. ADD: A judge would have to declare these findings, maybe a panel of judges.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X