View Single Post
Old 07-25-2017, 03:13 AM   #24
Ten Point
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Littlefield
Hunt In: South Texas

Originally Posted by Livin'2hunt View Post
In the U.K., a one year old baby named Charlie Gard is now going to die because the single-payer system would not permit the child travel to the United States for the treatment and cure awaiting his arrival. The parents had to sue Parliament in order to permit the treatment because he was locked into mandated single-payer. If Charlie would have received treatment early after diagnosis, his life could have been saved but the protracted litigation will prohibit effective treatment. This IS a death panel system. Forgive me if I don't see the upside to it.

Think about it
One govt would not pay for a patient to fly to another country for medical treatment

No medical plan in the USA public or private will fly you to Spain to get stem cell treatments.

The example you gave here is not single payer related at all.

Name one medical insurance program in the top 50 countries in the world that will pay for its members to fly to another country to seek treatment in a non emergency setting.

You won't be able to find one.
texansfan is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top