Thermal scopes

[csmith936]

If money is no object, there is stuff out there that puts trijicon to shame.

Best advice I have is rent a couple and try them out. I personally like to use a thermal for spotting because I drive around on big acreage at night until I find a sounder and then figure out the best way to get closer to them for a shot. So it makes sense for me to have a thermal with a bit of native zoom to it.

Just curious to what puts Trijicon to shame that a normal civilian can purchase?

[Trevor73402]

Just curious to what puts Trijicon to shame that a normal civilian can purchase?

Interested in this info as well.

[-HIC-]

Just curious to what puts Trijicon to shame that a normal civilian can purchase?

I would like to know as well. My nephew is 11b and says my XP50 is better than what they have. I am sure the team guys have some awesome stuff but that is not the norm. Now if you are talking aircraft, or other larger equipment that is mounted, different story.

[Greenheadless]

Hit up Jason on here. (Outdoor legacy gear) . I would not buy from a big box or online because it will be hard to get any support if you ever have any issues.

Like others have said. Trijicon for the highest quality without a budget. Pulsar trail for quality at a reasonable price.

https://outdoorlegacygear.com

Best advise you will get out of this whole thread ^^^^^^^

[TheWidowMaker]

I owned a trijicon ir hunter mk2 35mm and now use a pulsar trail xp50. I prefer the pulsar and like the image in the pulsar better plus all the extra features you get

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Mac D]

Check out accufire. They are new. A buddy of mine runs it. so they puy me on the prostaff team and i was able to work with them on the final product.

[gingib]

I owned a trijicon ir hunter mk2 35mm and now use a pulsar trail xp50. I prefer the pulsar and like the image in the pulsar better plus all the extra features you get

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Now sure how you can say Pulsar has a better image and it has less zoom.

[gingib]

Just curious to what puts Trijicon to shame that a normal civilian can purchase?

LMAO. I would love to hear this also

[csmith936]

LMAO. I would love to hear this also

lol Im still waiting....

[txhunter90]

Check out accufire. They are new. A buddy of mine runs it. so they puy me on the prostaff team and i was able to work with them on the final product.

Night Vision vs. Thermal... Night vision doesnt hold a candle to thermal.

[txhunter90]

LMAO. I would love to hear this also

Maybe he is talking about the EOTECH LWTS? Only thing I can think of, but they are $14k.

But to say something puts the Trijicon to shame, has not really ever hunted with a trijicon muchless a thermal. There is no hunting thermal under 10K that is better picture quality than a Reap or MkII or III.

[TXbowman]

Right now even a low end thermal sight is way out of my budget. In time do you think they will become more affordable?

[txhunter90]

Right now even a low end thermal sight is way out of my budget. In time do you think they will become more affordable?

They are starting to get down big time. Starting $1500-$2000 for entry level thermals.

[csmith936]

Maybe he is talking about the EOTECH LWTS? Only thing I can think of, but they are $14k.

But to say something puts the Trijicon to shame, has not really ever hunted with a trijicon muchless a thermal. There is no hunting thermal under 10K that is better picture quality than a Reap or MkII or III.

I’ve used a LWTS and the reap is still better in my opinion

[SC-Texas]

I’ve used a LWTS and the reap is still better in my opinion

I have to agree with this. Generally speaking, a clip-on whose image has to go through all of glass in the day optic to get to your eyes is going to give a picture that is not as good as a standalone optic with a similar quality ocular display.

I have used the cnvd-t, lwts, T70, snipe ir and they generally don't give as good an image as a Mark 3 or a reap.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk