Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
School Safety Plan. Thoughts?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by J Sweet View PostIm not seeing one thing in there that would of prevented this shooting or any of the recent past ones. Just politicians politicking.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Traildust View PostHardening schools and adding more armed guards or allowing teachers to carry wouldn't / couldn't have helped in any of the recent shootings?
Now metal detectors with armed LE IMO would of prevented a kid from bringing a shotgun hidden under a trench coat into the school. We do this at banks, courthouses, airports, concert venues, night clubs, etc.........
I don't buy the then the bottle neck will be attacked argument. It could but like in all the examples above it rarely happens. Armed LE using standard behavioral analysis techniques used by DHS in airports/train stations/sea port terminals works just fine.
Comment
-
Knowing that there were more armed guards and/or teachers in the school could've and probably would've prevented several of these shootings. Knowing that the school is a gun-free sitting duck zone is a big reason why these psychopaths choose to commit their violent acts at the school rather than somewhere else that's more likely to have armed people around.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shane View PostKnowing that there were more armed guards and/or teachers in the school could've and probably would've prevented several of these shootings. Knowing that the school is a gun-free sitting duck zone is a big reason why these psychopaths choose to commit their violent acts at the school rather than somewhere else that's more likely to have armed people around.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shane View PostKnowing that there were more armed guards and/or teachers in the school could've and probably would've prevented several of these shootings. Knowing that the school is a gun-free sitting duck zone is a big reason why these psychopaths choose to commit their violent acts at the school rather than somewhere else that's more likely to have armed people around.
The problem with this is they wont know teachers are armed. In the article they condition that carrying teachers will be anonymous. It does not give the visual presence of a hard target by arming teachers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by J Sweet View PostThe problem with this is they wont know teachers are armed. In the article they condition that carrying teachers will be anonymous. It does not give the visual presence of a hard target by arming teachers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They won't know "which" teachers are armed, but they will know there are armed teachers on campus.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stuck View PostThey won't know "which" teachers are armed, but they will know there are armed teachers on campus.
But I agree with J, an armed leo is much more of a visual deterrent ....but all options should be on the table.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Traildust View PostYes......have big fuggin signs out front, on every door and entrance and school bus!
But I agree with J, an armed leo is much more of a visual deterrent ....but all options should be on the table.
as opposed to not knowing who's carrying...
Comment
-
Originally posted by J Sweet View PostThe problem with this is they wont know teachers are armed. In the article they condition that carrying teachers will be anonymous. It does not give the visual presence of a hard target by arming teachers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by J Sweet View PostThe problem with this is they wont know teachers are armed. In the article they condition that carrying teachers will be anonymous. It does not give the visual presence of a hard target by arming teachers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
Comment