Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s Travel Ban

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s Travel Ban


    #2
    Not shocked.... despite the laws of this country, this ruling will be mocked as “anti american” and racist/bigoted. Cuz those are buzz words now and always for the opposition

    Comment


      #3
      Good...

      Comment


        #4
        Laughing at our local CBS news in DFW. They are asking who agrees with it in downtown Dallas? What a laugh...Dallas is as or more liberal than Austin...sickening to this Texan!

        Comment


          #5
          But we have proven that an unelected activist can delay presidential orders for as long as it takes the Scotus to overturn

          Comment


            #6
            Maga

            Comment


              #7
              Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s Travel Ban

              Originally posted by kumathebear View Post
              Laughing at our local CBS news in DFW. They are asking who agrees with it in downtown Dallas? What a laugh...Dallas is as or more liberal than Austin...sickening to this Texan!


              San Francisco is almost not as liberal as Austin. You’ll find far more conservatives among the freaks in Dallas than you will in Austin.

              Not saying that Dallas doesn’t have its fair share. It’s a big city and their all over run with liberal scum.

              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
              Last edited by MBV77; 06-26-2018, 04:59 PM.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Playa View Post
                Not shocked.... despite the laws of this country, this ruling will be mocked as “anti american” and racist/bigoted. Cuz those are buzz words now and always for the opposition
                yeah, but who cares what they think.

                Comment


                  #9
                  The libs responses are classic and expected. Pretty sure that racist Ellison needs to have his citizenship revoked.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by flywise View Post
                    The libs responses are classic and expected. Pretty sure that racist Ellison needs to have his citizenship revoked.
                    I wish this was possible (revoked) but you know there is no way he can be RACIST, right?
                    some of these people that rail against racism are the most racist among us.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I am glad it passed but honestly how valid are their rulings overall when it's always split amongst party lines with a 4-5 vote. Remember John Roberts and his antics.
                      I mean what if they ruled that the 2nd amendment was no longer constitutional would Americans that believe in it accept it as the law of the land all of the sudden?
                      It's ridiculous that they can read a law and come up with two totally opposite opinions.

                      Sent from my VS987 using Tapatalk

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by iamntxhunter View Post
                        I am glad it passed but honestly how valid are their rulings overall when it's always split amongst party lines with a 4-5 vote. Remember John Roberts and his antics.
                        I mean what if they ruled that the 2nd amendment was no longer constitutional would Americans that believe in it accept it as the law of the land all of the sudden?
                        It's ridiculous that they can read a law and come up with two totally opposite opinions.

                        Sent from my VS987 using Tapatalk
                        Yep. Some of them read and apply the law as written. The others read into the law what they think it ought to say, whether it actually says that or not.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by stickerpatch59 View Post
                          I wish this was possible (revoked) but you know there is no way he can be RACIST, right?
                          some of these people that rail against racism are the most racist among us.
                          Absolutely

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Shane View Post
                            Yep. Some of them read and apply the law as written. The others read into the law what they think it ought to say, whether it actually says that or not.
                            Exactly right
                            There is no way many of these decisions should be anything other than 9-0
                            Maybe 7-2 If it's a really complicated issue.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by iamntxhunter View Post
                              I am glad it passed but honestly how valid are their rulings overall when it's always split amongst party lines with a 4-5 vote. Remember John Roberts and his antics.
                              I mean what if they ruled that the 2nd amendment was no longer constitutional would Americans that believe in it accept it as the law of the land all of the sudden?
                              It's ridiculous that they can read a law and come up with two totally opposite opinions.

                              Sent from my VS987 using Tapatalk


                              Because they let partisan politics cloud their judgement.

                              If they would just apply the laws and constitution as its written and check their politics at the door like they should the verdicts would be more in unison.


                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X