Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

School Safety Plan. Thoughts?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    School Safety Plan. Thoughts?

    The governor's announcement follows three days of roundtable discussions about school safety last week at the Capitol. He said he was open to a special session to implement some of his ideas.

    #2
    Im not seeing one thing in there that would of prevented this shooting or any of the recent past ones. Just politicians politicking.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by J Sweet View Post
      Im not seeing one thing in there that would of prevented this shooting or any of the recent past ones. Just politicians politicking.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by J Sweet View Post
        Im not seeing one thing in there that would of prevented this shooting or any of the recent past ones. Just politicians politicking.
        Hardening schools and adding more armed guards or allowing teachers to carry wouldn't / couldn't have helped in any of the recent shootings?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Traildust View Post
          Hardening schools and adding more armed guards or allowing teachers to carry wouldn't / couldn't have helped in any of the recent shootings?
          Could of yes. Would of no.

          Now metal detectors with armed LE IMO would of prevented a kid from bringing a shotgun hidden under a trench coat into the school. We do this at banks, courthouses, airports, concert venues, night clubs, etc.........

          I don't buy the then the bottle neck will be attacked argument. It could but like in all the examples above it rarely happens. Armed LE using standard behavioral analysis techniques used by DHS in airports/train stations/sea port terminals works just fine.

          Comment


            #6
            Knowing that there were more armed guards and/or teachers in the school could've and probably would've prevented several of these shootings. Knowing that the school is a gun-free sitting duck zone is a big reason why these psychopaths choose to commit their violent acts at the school rather than somewhere else that's more likely to have armed people around.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by J Sweet View Post
              Im not seeing one thing in there that would of prevented this shooting or any of the recent past ones. Just politicians politicking.
              ………………..and they are GREAT at it!!!!

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Landrover View Post
                ………………..and they are GREAT at it!!!!


                [emoji1303]


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Shane View Post
                  Knowing that there were more armed guards and/or teachers in the school could've and probably would've prevented several of these shootings. Knowing that the school is a gun-free sitting duck zone is a big reason why these psychopaths choose to commit their violent acts at the school rather than somewhere else that's more likely to have armed people around.
                  This.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Shane View Post
                    Knowing that there were more armed guards and/or teachers in the school could've and probably would've prevented several of these shootings. Knowing that the school is a gun-free sitting duck zone is a big reason why these psychopaths choose to commit their violent acts at the school rather than somewhere else that's more likely to have armed people around.


                    The problem with this is they wont know teachers are armed. In the article they condition that carrying teachers will be anonymous. It does not give the visual presence of a hard target by arming teachers.


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by J Sweet View Post
                      The problem with this is they wont know teachers are armed. In the article they condition that carrying teachers will be anonymous. It does not give the visual presence of a hard target by arming teachers.


                      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                      They won't know "which" teachers are armed, but they will know there are armed teachers on campus.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Stuck View Post
                        They won't know "which" teachers are armed, but they will know there are armed teachers on campus.
                        Yes......have big fuggin signs out front, on every door and entrance and school bus!

                        But I agree with J, an armed leo is much more of a visual deterrent ....but all options should be on the table.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Traildust View Post
                          Yes......have big fuggin signs out front, on every door and entrance and school bus!

                          But I agree with J, an armed leo is much more of a visual deterrent ....but all options should be on the table.
                          Some anti-opencarry peeps...think a visual armed guard would be less of a deterrent because hes now targetable...
                          as opposed to not knowing who's carrying...

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by J Sweet View Post
                            The problem with this is they wont know teachers are armed. In the article they condition that carrying teachers will be anonymous. It does not give the visual presence of a hard target by arming teachers.


                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                            Students will figure out which teachers are carrying in less than a week.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by J Sweet View Post
                              The problem with this is they wont know teachers are armed. In the article they condition that carrying teachers will be anonymous. It does not give the visual presence of a hard target by arming teachers.


                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                              They won't know specifically which teachers are armed. They'll know that there are armed teachers at the school. That makes it even more of a deterrent. They have to assume that any teacher at the school could be armed.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X