Originally posted by jer_james
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dam...Even HuffPost is calling BS on Pocahontas!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by jer_james View PostWhy dont you reference the 1/64?
Do you care what DNA Bustamante used? Do you care about his conclusion from the data he analyzed?
Why not reference what the Cherokee nation said about Warren DNA test? Did you read the other article, written by an Indian.
Did you do the math, 1/64 = .015625? That is really what you want to hang your hat on? That is enough for you to categorize Warren as a "minority"? Remember she listed her-crackerarse self as a minority numerous times (before she uhhh, factually proved it)
Bustamantes conclusion is below.
While the vast majority of the individual’s ancestry is European, the results strongly support the existence of an unadmixed Native American ancestor in the individual’s pedigree, likely in the range of 6-10 generations ago.
He gave a range. I used a number within the range that Bustamante gave. Didnt even call out that his statement was pretty open ended.
To answer your question 1/1024 is an infinitely smaller number than 1/64, and IMHO puts Warrens claim in a more factual light, and furthers my argument much better.
You gonna answer my questions now?
Comment
-
Warren is a fake and a liar, but she is a politician, so it goes with the territory. I am most bothered by the part near the end of the article in which the author writes, "Learning is often uncomfortable, especially in a diverse nation built on interlocking histories of colonization, slavery and racism that’s under siege by forces who call for a return to darker days." I have not heard anyone, republican or otherwise calling for a return to the days of slavery and culturally accepted racism. He obviously has a hidden agenda.
Comment
Comment