I have always wondered what encourages someone to vent on an Internet group web-site when their stuff gets stolen. So when I walked out to my truck last night and found a smashed window and my camera bag gone I kind of better understood. I was at Jax in Houston. I carry my camera bag everywhere I go. I know the risks and for the last 8 or 9 years had no problems...(which is remarkable alone).
The crooks grabbed my bag which held my Nikon D300, two lenses, speedflash, etc. etc. That's all they took...but I guess to a crackhead/methhead that was quite a score.
The bag was on the floor. I kind of think they were watching me a did a quick "recon" after I walked away and before the dome light went off in the truck...fyi if you can, program your dome lights to go off quickly. Of course there was the bag of shirts and stuff that I wear up at my land...maybe they saw that and "found" the camera bag after getting in. Yes, it sucks.
Anyway, there is my vent...now on to the advice part...
I loved the D300, it performed excellent in low light situations (I shoot fire-ground photography in Houston and alot of my stuff is at night). I have heard that the D700 is even better with a higher ISO rating ability (along with a "better" price tag). Does anyone have any experience with the both cameras for a comparison...or an opinion on the D700. I am reluctant to go status-quo, but the D300 did me well. Insurance will help, but the D700 is a big step in price. Any advice is mucho appreciated.
The crooks grabbed my bag which held my Nikon D300, two lenses, speedflash, etc. etc. That's all they took...but I guess to a crackhead/methhead that was quite a score.
The bag was on the floor. I kind of think they were watching me a did a quick "recon" after I walked away and before the dome light went off in the truck...fyi if you can, program your dome lights to go off quickly. Of course there was the bag of shirts and stuff that I wear up at my land...maybe they saw that and "found" the camera bag after getting in. Yes, it sucks.
Anyway, there is my vent...now on to the advice part...
I loved the D300, it performed excellent in low light situations (I shoot fire-ground photography in Houston and alot of my stuff is at night). I have heard that the D700 is even better with a higher ISO rating ability (along with a "better" price tag). Does anyone have any experience with the both cameras for a comparison...or an opinion on the D700. I am reluctant to go status-quo, but the D300 did me well. Insurance will help, but the D700 is a big step in price. Any advice is mucho appreciated.
Comment