Originally posted by ladrones
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Full Benghazi Report
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by J Sweet View Postlink?
Report_of_the_Benghazi_Select_Committee_Democratic _Members-Honoring_Courage_Improving_Security_and__Exploitat ion_of_a_Tragedy
Just read the link itself and you will get an idea of what it contains. Did the devout progressives just recently have an illegal sit-in to exploit the tragedy of Orlando and provide cover for a muslim terrorist attack on the queer community?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ladrones View Posthttp://democrats-benghazi.house.gov/...y.pdf#page=264
Report_of_the_Benghazi_Select_Committee_Democratic _Members-Honoring_Courage_Improving_Security_and__Exploitat ion_of_a_Tragedy
Just read the link itself and you will get an idea of what it contains. Did the devout progressives just recently have an illegal sit-in to exploit the tragedy of Orlando and provide cover for a muslim terrorist attack on the queer community?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Clay C View PostShe is in line to be the first woman president. Many of her voters don't care about anything beyond that.
Comment
-
1. Media is already hammering the timing of this report as only a jab to keep Hillary from winning presidency.
2. Media is pointing out that report does not directly place blame on her.
3. Media is spinning that report shows how inept gov't is in dealing with situations. (This should give her a new talking point of something she'll fix)
4. Media is now pointing out that he shouldn't have been in Benghazi since all other countries reps had left. (already read articles saying he was there on his own accord)
Hopefully I'm wrong, but I'd say this matter has already been put to bed. Let's all just move along, nothing to see here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OleTomTalker View Post1. Media is already hammering the timing of this report as only a jab to keep Hillary from winning presidency.
2. Media is pointing out that report does not directly place blame on her.
3. Media is spinning that report shows how inept gov't is in dealing with situations. (This should give her a new talking point of something she'll fix)
4. Media is now pointing out that he shouldn't have been in Benghazi since all other countries reps had left. (already read articles saying he was there on his own accord)
Hopefully I'm wrong, but I'd say this matter has already been put to bed. Let's all just move along, nothing to see here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hot_rod_eddie View PostFrom what I read he was there covering up the White House sending the munitions gained from the topple of Gaddafi from Libya to Syria.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OleTomTalker View Post1. Media is already hammering the timing of this report as only a jab to keep Hillary from winning presidency.
2. Media is pointing out that report does not directly place blame on her.
3. Media is spinning that report shows how inept gov't is in dealing with situations. (This should give her a new talking point of something she'll fix)
4. Media is now pointing out that he shouldn't have been in Benghazi since all other countries reps had left. (already read articles saying he was there on his own accord)
Hopefully I'm wrong, but I'd say this matter has already been put to bed. Let's all just move along, nothing to see here.
5.) it was supposedly common knowledge that the "married" ambassador was bi-sexual. He was NOT where he was supposed to be and did not have the proper protection (guards) as he was with his boyfriend that was a local Libyian. The speculation goes that he was set up by this boyfriend.
With all the gaps I don't doubt there is much more to the story. It seems that his man-parts were also cut off..........which never made the news from what I can remember. May or may not be true, but obviously there is MORE to this sad story. I tend to believe it more and more as time goes by.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Landrover View PostHonestly I had heard something about this mess that I had never seen printed or discussed anywhere. I am not one to begrudge the dead so lets just add this to your list.
5.) it was supposedly common knowledge that the "married" ambassador was bi-sexual. He was NOT where he was supposed to be and did not have the proper protection (guards) as he was with his boyfriend that was a local Libyian. The speculation goes that he was set up by this boyfriend.
With all the gaps I don't doubt there is much more to the story. It seems that his man-parts were also cut off..........which never made the news from what I can remember. May or may not be true, but obviously there is MORE to this sad story. I tend to believe it more and more as time goes by.
irrelevant.
bottom line is ..he (they) weren't awarded the protections they should have gotten given their position and the forces available to them when this went down.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Landrover View PostHonestly I had heard something about this mess that I had never seen printed or discussed anywhere. I am not one to begrudge the dead so lets just add this to your list.
5.) it was supposedly common knowledge that the "married" ambassador was bi-sexual. He was NOT where he was supposed to be and did not have the proper protection (guards) as he was with his boyfriend that was a local Libyian. The speculation goes that he was set up by this boyfriend.
With all the gaps I don't doubt there is much more to the story. It seems that his man-parts were also cut off..........which never made the news from what I can remember. May or may not be true, but obviously there is MORE to this sad story. I tend to believe it more and more as time goes by.
Comment
Comment