Originally posted by texasnavy05
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Good bye bump stocks.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ironman View PostThe whole 18/21 year old thing is jacked up. You are responsible enough to go and fight, and possibly die, for your country, but you aren't responsible enough to drink. Seems hypocritical to me.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Clearly some of you haven't seen the polling. Now the last election poll showed they can be way off but even with a large margin for error we're in bad shape.
Summary 58% believe it should be harder to buy a firearm
77% let that sink in more than 3 out of 4 think that there should be stricter background checks. Wishful thinking says it's just the wording of the quetions.
Article is from OCt 2017
http://news.gallup.com/poll/220595/s...aws-edges.aspx
Comment
-
Originally posted by Part Timer View PostWrap your head around this. We got 17 year olds telling us how our laws should be and saying that 18 year olds are not responsible enough to have a gun......but somehow they are responsible enough to come up with new laws on when you should have a gun and what type it should be......and people are listening to them. Insanity.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bumpy View PostBanning bump stocks is not banning firearms. A bump stock is an accessory. Nothing to do with the 2nd amendment.
I just don't get the cause for uproar over bump stocks, from either side, I guess..Last edited by PondPopper; 02-22-2018, 06:30 PM.
Comment
-
"uproar" may be because this slippery slope has now been accepted... soon to follow ..high capacity mags (again), echo triggers, repeating firearms, bullets...etc
Its not a stretch once pandoras box is opened....with the easiest argument now being "But you had no problem with bumpstocks...."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Part Timer View PostWrap your head around this. We got 17 year olds telling us how our laws should be and saying that 18 year olds are not responsible enough to have a gun......but somehow they are responsible enough to come up with new laws on when you should have a gun and what type it should be......and people are listening to them. Insanity.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I'll debate topics I'm passionate about but we are all allowed to express our 1st.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ArmyAg97 View PostClearly some of you haven't seen the polling. Now the last election poll showed they can be way off but even with a large margin for error we're in bad shape.
Summary 58% believe it should be harder to buy a firearm
77% let that sink in more than 3 out of 4 think that there should be stricter background checks. Wishful thinking says it's just the wording of the quetions.
Article is from OCt 2017
http://news.gallup.com/poll/220595/s...aws-edges.aspx
Hoggslayer
Comment
-
Originally posted by Artos View PostIt doesn't bother me too much...we also have teens standing up for the 2nd & dropping cnn in the grease about their town halls being scripted & exposing the media. I saw both sides on whitehouse listening session & hard for me to get down on a kid that lost friends & doesn't understand the complexities of the 2nd. I'm very proud of the fact we do have future defenders of liberty too.
I'll debate topics I'm passionate about but we are all allowed to express our 1st.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HuntForHorns View PostIf they do ban them will it make them illegal to use? possess? buy? Do they buy them back from the people that have them or just expect them to destroy them?
Here is the proposed rule submitted into the federal register 4 days ago....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Neck View PostYou will be required to destroy them.
Here is the proposed rule submitted into the federal register 4 days ago....
https://www.federalregister.gov/docu...m_medium=email
Idiots.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DJM View PostBump stocks are low on their priority list .Give an inch........fast forward to 2:50.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-4tVcAho74
Yup. You show them weakness they will pounce. Politics is downstream from culture.
Plus, add to it that a bumpstock ban is essentially a regulation on cyclic rate of a semi auto, and you open up all kinds of horrible possibilities.
Comment
Comment