Us h.r. 621

[justhrowit]

622 is still on the table.

...and now we start working on that one.

[popup_menace]

The truly best scenario would be the states buying the land and then retaining it as public property. This way the state's taxpayers have more of a direct effect on how the land is managed. But, as others have said, this has caused a lot of lost public land in other states

[backwoods]

The truly best scenario would be the states buying the land and then retaining it as public property. This way the state's taxpayers have more of a direct effect on how the land is managed

Watch this short video that explains why states could not handle the volume of public land

https://youtu.be/ekv996IhjLM

[Felix40]

The truly best scenario would be the states buying the land and then retaining it as public property. This way the state's taxpayers have more of a direct effect on how the land is managed. But, as others have said, this has caused a lot of lost public land in other states

The states don't have the means to take care of all that land. We need to leave this land the way it is unless you want to see a ski resort built in your favorite hunting spot.

[rattler03]

this is bad idea all around for the American people. there are countless ways we can cut down on our debt, selling off public lands that everybody has access to should not be at the top of the list of things to liquidate.

It amazes how many so called "sportsman" on TBH aren't staunchly opposed to this bill.

[doppelganger]

http://discussions.texasbowhunter.com/forums/showthread.php?t=632393

[Bob G]

We need to keep this at the top...
Way to important to let this get away from us...
Make sure you let officials know...
This would only be a part of the deterioration of what we own together...
If we give it away now what will be left for future generations???

tending the fire,
Bob G.