Wow, I'm surprised after reading the other threads about this. That probably means there's a whole lot we don't know about it, or a whole lot the state couldn't prove.
Wow, I'm surprised after reading the other threads about this. That probably means there's a whole lot we don't know about it, or a whole lot the state couldn't prove.
I’m guessing a whole lot we don’t know. The original story I heard could have been true with this outcome though. That story was what that the wrongdoing was retrieval based. It’s all guesses on our part though
Wow, I'm surprised after reading the other threads about this. That probably means there's a whole lot we don't know about it, or a whole lot the state couldn't prove.
Comment