Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Grizzly Delisting.......BAM!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Grizzly Delisting.......BAM!!!

    SCI Applauds Long-Overdue Yellowstone Grizzly Delisting
    *
    Safari Club International celebrates with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, and hunter-conservationists throughout the country the impending delisting of grizzly bears. The removal of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) population of grizzlies (Ursus arctos horribilis) from the federal threatened species list means that management of this recovered population of bears will finally return to the state agencies who have worked diligently with stakeholders to conserve the population. The GYE population consists of portions of northwestern Wyoming, southwestern Montana and eastern Idaho. Biologists estimate that approximately 700 bears now live in that area.

    SCI has long been involved in the grizzly bear delisting saga. The Service first listed the grizzly bears in the lower 48 states as threatened back in 1973. In 2007, the Service delisted the GYE population and were soon after sued in federal court.* SCI joined the suit as an intervenor to defend the delisting. After the district court invalidated the delisting, SCI, along with the other defendants, appealed the ruling. The appellate court affirmed only part of the ruling but the grizzly remained on the threatened species list. Although the Service predicted that it would be able to delist the bears again in 2013, the Service did not propose to remove the GYE population of bears from federal ESA protection until March of 2016. SCI filed two sets of comments in support of the proposed delisting.

    The Service will publish a final delist rule in the next few days and the delisting will go into effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Despite decades of recovery efforts, extensive scientific research, and demonstrated recovery, the battle over GYE grizzlies is far from over. At least one anti-hunting group has already stated that they will sue to reverse the delisting. If that happens, SCI is very likely to join that litigation and once again defend the delisting and sustainable use management of the bear.

    #2
    Glad to finally see, but now the lawsuits will come out of the woodwork. I expect it will be years before any grizzlies are hunted in the lower 48, but it's a step in the right direction.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Drycreek3189 View Post
      Glad to finally see, but now the lawsuits will come out of the woodwork. I expect it will be years before any grizzlies are hunted in the lower 48, but it's a step in the right direction.
      Your summary would be correct by all chatter I am reading. YES...........we are going the right way after decades!!!

      Comment


        #4
        The New Jersey cat lady's, as Rinella refers to them, are about to get nuts.

        Comment


          #5
          It looks like from what I'm seeing that there is only fringe opposed. They will still have Federal protection in National Parks.


          -------------------------------
          Violence never settles anything
          -Genghis Kahn

          Comment


            #6
            "Charismatic Megafauna"

            That's what the huggers will be trying to save. Anthropomorphism via Disney movies has brainwashed 3 generations of knuckleheads that think bears are our gentle friends.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Stoof View Post
              It looks like from what I'm seeing that there is only fringe opposed. They will still have Federal protection in National Parks.


              -------------------------------
              Violence never settles anything
              -Genghis Kahn
              Duhhh... ALL animals have Federal protection in National Parks... If they didn't, I'd be in that line to go hunt elk in RMNP!!

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by CEO View Post
                The New Jersey cat lady's, as Rinella refers to them, are about to get nuts.
                I got into a "discussion" with one of them on Facebook.
                I offered known facts and links to known facts supporting my argument that sport hunting helps game animals. She offered profanity. Lots and lots of profanity. And personal attacks.
                She got a little stirred up.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Protect them in the parks....outside of that fee game IMO!! I think the grizz have recovered nicely! Limited license and all that....but the grizz population is huntable in the lower 48 IMO

                  Comment


                    #10
                    "Facts are stubborn things", Ronald Reagan. Profanity and name calling is their mantra when confronted by facts.
                    Originally posted by Brute Killer View Post
                    I got into a "discussion" with one of them on Facebook.
                    I offered known facts and links to known facts supporting my argument that sport hunting helps game animals. She offered profanity. Lots and lots of profanity. And personal attacks.
                    She got a little stirred up.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Brute Killer View Post
                      I got into a "discussion" with one of them on Facebook.
                      I offered known facts and links to known facts supporting my argument that sport hunting helps game animals. She offered profanity. Lots and lots of profanity. And personal attacks.
                      She got a little stirred up.
                      I try to avoid those conversations and usually distance myself from the "others".

                      However, about ten years ago I met a couple of "fellas" from our Capital City at Luckenbach one day. I was sitting behind the store drinking a beer and they struck up a conversation with me. I listened as they told me how much pain an animal experiences when shot and the cruelty of hunting. About the time the one that looked like a woman started talking again, one of them big Rhode Island Reds that was roosting in a Live Oak above us, pooped on the table.
                      Wasn't much else to say at that point, so I got up and left. True story.

                      Back to topic, they really do need to go after wolves next.
                      Last edited by Radar; 06-23-2017, 06:36 AM.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Very good news. Now we need get rid of the reintroduced wolf populations.


                        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by JAGR View Post
                          Very good news. Now we need get rid of the reintroduced wolf populations.


                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                          Never really thought about hunting wolf but after what they have done to the elk and moose herds.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by JAGR View Post
                            Very good news. Now we need let the states manage the reintroduced wolf populations.


                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                            FIFY......or at least that is how I would word it

                            Comment


                              #15
                              I agree with dry creek I'd be suprised if we see grizzly hunting in lower 48 anytime soon but it sounds like the ranchers will have more freedom.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X