Lacy act only applies to illegally obtained (poached) animals
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Elk horns worth?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Austin View PostLacy act only applies to illegally obtained (poached) animalsOriginally posted by Mexico View PostWrong they're big game... legal. Ducks and geese no...
Sidenote: Texas contradicts federal law regarding elk, because for some reason they have tried to legally classify them as "exotic" instead of native. Which makes zero sense.Last edited by Longue Carabine; 10-24-2018, 05:14 PM.
Comment
-
Not true, per TPWD rule book. Granted it doesn't specify Elk, but other antlers are addressed.
Sale of Inedible Wildlife Parts
The following inedible wildlife parts may be purchased or sold if lawfully taken or possessed:
Hair, hide, antlers, bones, horns, skull, hooves, or sinew from the following game animals: mule deer, white-tailed deer, pronghorn, desert bighorn sheep, gray or cat squirrels, fox squirrels or red squirrels, and javelina (aka collared peccary).
Feathers, bones, or feet of game birds (turkey, pheasant, quail, and chachalaca) other than migratory birds may be used, purchased, or sold for making fishing flies, pillows, mattresses, and other similar commercial uses.
Feathers from migratory birds may not be purchased or sold for hats or ornamental purposes nor may a person purchase or sell mounted migratory game bird specimens or their parts taken by hunting.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Longue Carabine View PostIt doesn't pertain to just migratory birds . . It was primarily directed at big game. It was one of many legal actions taken over a hundred years ago to end market hunting in the United States. Collectively these laws made the sale of any GAME ANIMAL, or component thereof, illegal. You can still buy and sale non-game animals/animal parts. In addition, many states also have their own laws making the sale of any game animal parts illegal. If a state says it isn't illegal, it doesn't matter because federal law trumps state law. The sale of antlers is often not that well enforced. But every now and then they'll decide to make an example out of someone.
Sidenote: Texas contradicts federal law regarding elk, because for some reason they have tried to legally classify them as "exotic" instead of native. Which makes zero sense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Longue Carabine View PostIt doesn't pertain to just migratory birds . . It was primarily directed at big game. It was one of many legal actions taken over a hundred years ago to end market hunting in the United States. Collectively these laws made the sale of any GAME ANIMAL, or component thereof, illegal. You can still buy and sell non-game animals/animal parts. In addition, many states also have their own laws making the sale of any game animal parts illegal. If a state says it isn't illegal, it doesn't matter because federal law trumps state law. The sale of antlers is often not that well enforced. But every now and then they'll decide to make an example out of someone.
Sidenote: Texas contradicts federal law regarding elk, because for some reason they have tried to legally classify them as "exotic" instead of native. Which makes zero sense.
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
Comment
-
The Lacey Act only applies to fish, wildlife, and plants that have been taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of a state, federal, tribal, or foreign law.
TPWD has jurisdiction over wildlife resources of the State of Texas, of which elk are not a part.
Outdoor Annual:
The following inedible wildlife parts may be purchased or sold if lawfully taken or possessed:
Hair, hide, antlers, bones, horns, skull, hooves, or sinew from the following game animals: mule deer, white-tailed deer, pronghorn, desert bighorn sheep, gray or cat squirrels, fox squirrels or red squirrels, and javelina (aka collared peccary)
I was in Chama this year and market is less there- $10 or so a pound. Supply and demand I suppose.
It's kind of hard to believe from Antlers86 post that sheds bring more per pound that a skull cap. In that case I'd break them apart and sell them as sheds. 12 lbs. for a set at $20/lb. is $240 vs. the $150-$200 per skull cap. Weird...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Longue Carabine View PostIt doesn't pertain to just migratory birds . . It was primarily directed at big game. It was one of many legal actions taken over a hundred years ago to end market hunting in the United States. Collectively these laws made the sale of any GAME ANIMAL, or component thereof, illegal. You can still buy and sell non-game animals/animal parts. In addition, many states also have their own laws making the sale of any game animal parts illegal. If a state says it isn't illegal, it doesn't matter because federal law trumps state law. The sale of antlers is often not that well enforced. But every now and then they'll decide to make an example out of someone.
Sidenote: Texas contradicts federal law regarding elk, because for some reason they have tried to legally classify them as "exotic" instead of native. Which makes zero sense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Longue Carabine View PostCollectively these laws made the sale of any GAME ANIMAL, or component thereof, illegal.
16 USC §3372(a) Offenses other than marking offenses It is unlawful for any person—
(1) to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any fish or wildlife or plant taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any law, treaty, or regulation of the United States or in violation of any Indian tribal law;
Comment
-
Originally posted by Longue Carabine View PostIt doesn't pertain to just migratory birds . . It was primarily directed at big game. It was one of many legal actions taken over a hundred years ago to end market hunting in the United States. Collectively these laws made the sale of any GAME ANIMAL, or component thereof, illegal. You can still buy and sell non-game animals/animal parts. In addition, many states also have their own laws making the sale of any game animal parts illegal. If a state says it isn't illegal, it doesn't matter because federal law trumps state law. The sale of antlers is often not that well enforced. But every now and then they'll decide to make an example out of someone.
Sidenote: Texas contradicts federal law regarding elk, because for some reason they have tried to legally classify them as "exotic" instead of native. Which makes zero sense.
Comment
Comment